Online Courses
Explore
Offline Courses
-
LAW
-
Judiciary
-
Management UG
-
CAT & OMETs
-
CUET
-
Design
-
Architecture
-
UPSC Law Optional
Explore
Test Series
Explore
Resources
-
LAW UG (5 Year LLB)
-
LAW UG (3 Year LLB)
-
LLM + LAW Officer
-
Judiciary
-
Management UG
-
Management PG
-
Design & Arch.
-
NTA CUET [UG]
-
Career Counselling
-
Current Affairs
-
UPSC LAW
Explore
Join Us
Explore
Contact Us
Explore









Krish
· commented
· 1 Months ago
Knowledge Expert
· commented
· 1 Months ago
Either it was supposed to come from other parts of India, or it was supposed to come from overseas by ship. But Britain was running out of food in early 1943 because the Germans were sinking more freighters in the Atlantic than the Allies could build. So diverting shipping to Bengal in 1943 would have greatly increased the risk of Hitler winning the war. Somebody should ask Dr. Sen just how high a risk of the Nazis winning World War II does he think Churchill and Roosevelt should have agreed to.
Basically Britain wants to defeat Nazi Germany
Thus Churchill diverted the stock which was supposed to reach Bengal for food and other basic needs to Britain to strengthen their pillars to effectively compete with Nazi Germany. As India at that time was governed under the command of British Raj, thus Churchill was the ultimate superior in deciding superior in deciding the relocation of stock, otherwise they would have been destroyed by Nazi Germany in WW2.
You wanted an explanation. Take it. Or Google for the full explanation.
Regards
TR