Online Courses
-
Law UG
-
Management UG
-
CUET UG
-
Design & Architecture
-
Judiciary Exams
-
3 Year LLB
-
Law PG
-
CAT & OMETs
-
Mentorship
-
Career Counselling
Offline Courses
-
LAW
-
Judiciary
-
Management UG
-
CAT & OMETs
-
CUET
-
Design
-
Architecture
-
UPSC Law Optional
Test Series
-
LAW UG (3 Year LLB)
-
LAW UG (5 Year LLB)
-
Judiciary
-
Judiciary Study Material (JSM)
-
Chhattisgarh (CGPSC)
-
Haryana (HJS)
-
Uttar Pradesh (UP PCSJ)
-
Rajasthan (RJS)
-
Madhya Pradesh [MP]
-
Delhi [DJS]
-
Bihar [BPSC]
-
Uttarakhand [UKPSC]
-
Jharkhand [JKPSC]
-
Gujarat(GJS)
-
Himachal Pradesh [HPPSC]
-
Judiciary [All States]
-
MP ADPO
-
Bihar APO
-
UP APO
-
Haryana ADA
-
Rajasthan APO
-
CGPSC ADPO
-
-
LAW PG + Banking
-
Management UG
-
Management PG
-
NTA CUET
-
Scholarship Tests
-
Design and Arch.
-
All India Tests
-
LE Champions Batch Selection Test
-
SuperGrads CAT Diagnostic Test
Resources
-
LAW UG (5 Year LLB)
-
LAW UG (3 Year LLB)
-
LLM + LAW Officer
-
Judiciary
-
Management UG
-
Management PG
-
Design & Arch.
-
NTA CUET [UG]
-
Career Counselling
-
Current Affairs
-
UPSC LAW
Join Us
Contact Us
Book Store







Knowledge Expert
· commented
· 1 Months ago
Statements are-
No table is wood.
Some woods are chairs.
All chairs are stones.
Conclusions says "No stone is table." if we do not have any information regarding the relationship of Stone with Table, then it is the doubtful situation and in syllogism doubtful is said to be wrong. Hence not follow.
The another conclusion says "Some stones are woods" This will be true as some woods are chair and all chairs are stone.
Regards
Team TR