Discussions
satanik

· started a discussion

· 1 Months ago

Here, Conclusion(I) is directly violating Statement(c). So how can this Conclusion(I) be true? Please provide an explanation for this.
Thank you.

Question:
DIRECTIONS: In each of the question below are given three statements followed by four conclusion numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows (s) from  the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. 

Statements:

(a) Some cricketers are cats.

(b) All cats are tigers.

(c) Some tigers are not criketers.


Conclusions:

I. Some tigers are cricketers.

II. All cricketers are tigers.

III. All cats are cricketers.

IV. All tigers are cricketers.
Options:
A) None follows
B) Only I follows
C) Only I and II follow
D) Only II and III follow
E) All follow
Solution:
Ans: (b)

ankit

· commented

· 1 Months ago

mr satanik...conclusion 1 is the correct answer as it does not violating any of the statement.as per statement c some tigers are not cricketers ..it doesn't mean that any tiger can not be cricketer ..if he said that all tigers are not cricketer than it will violate the statement 1.

Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya

· commented

· 1 Months ago

Conclusion I is derived from Statements 1 and 2. As all cats are tigers and some of them (i.e. cats) are cricketers, it follows Some of the cricketers are tigers. This is statement I in reverse order.

All Rights Reserved Top Rankers