Discussions
Rakesh Reddy

· started a discussion

· 1 Months ago

need easy way(short-cut) of explaination , step-by-step...

Question:
DIRECTIONS: India bagged a total of two medals, one silver and one bronze from 117 athletes in Olympics. Badminton player PV Sindhu won historic silver medal in women’s singles badminton event. On the other hand, Wrestler Sakshi Malik secured a bronze in the 58 kg category to become India's first female wrestler to win an Olympic medal. And Dipa Karmakar from India was able to qualify one artistic gymnast into the Olympic competition for the first time since 1964. Despite the fact that these all sportswomen belonged from families with low income, still they managed to gather all their confidence and achieve what they aspire to be. This empowerment of women by encouraging them to participate in sports has opened up many new and exciting avenues for them in the world of sports.

Which of the following statement negates about the fact of empowerment of women?

(I) It was matter of proud for India that Indian women bagged two medals in Summer Olympics.

(II) Despite of giving all possible facilities Indian women athletes was unable to won even a single gold medal.

(III) Sindhu, Sakshi and Dipa creates sensation and generates a ray of hope among other Indian women athletes to build their career and make their country proud.

Options:
A) Only I
B) Only II and III
C) Only II
D) Only I and III
E) None of these
Solution:
Ans:(c) Only II statement negates the fact of empowerment of women. I and III statement support the fact of empowerment .These both statement praises the Indian women athlete. But despite of a sensational performance of Sakshi and Sindhu, IInd statement is talking of only negative part of game.

All Rights Reserved Top Rankers