Discussions
Bhargav Chauhan

· started a discussion

· 1 Months ago

Please Tell Me How The Answer is 270. . . And Why 600 Is Taken As Number of Companies ???

Question:

DIRECTIONS: These questions are based on the information given below.


Table gives, the number of companies, in different locations, in which the employment has increased decreased or remained the same, each as a percentage of the total number of companies in that location.


Table II gives a similar distribution, but based on the staff strengths of the companies instead of the locations.


Table - I

(By Location)


Location

Percentage of companies whose employment

Total

Number of Companies

increased (%)

remained same (%)

decreased (%)

City A

50

40

10

800

City B

42

45

13

1000

City C

64

30

6

700

City D

36

52

12

1000

City E

30

60

10

900

City F

45

50

05

600

City G

68

30

02

600

Total

46

45

9

5600


Table—II

(By Staff Strength)


Staff Strength

Percentage of companies whose employment

Total Number of of Companies

increased (%)

remained same (%)

decreased (%)

250 and below

40

50

10

2300

251 – 500

60

30

10

1900

501 – 1000

39

55

6

800

1001 and above

34

60

6

600

What is the number of companies in which there was an increase in the number of employees?
Options:
A) 270
B) 290
C) 320
D) 260
E) Can’t be determined
Solution:

Ans (a) Number of companies in which there is an increase in the number of employees

= \(\cfrac{45}{100}\) × 600 = 270

Knowledge Expert

· commented

· 1 Months ago

From Table - I
(By Location)
And Table—II
(By Staff Strength)
The value 45 is taken. And total is 600
45/100*600=270

All Rights Reserved Top Rankers