CLEAR
Toprankers-Info

+91 7676564400

Mobile App

Get it on Google Play
Discussions
Tags:

Articles

Discussions
Submit Discussion
Prashant Singh

· started a discussion

· 1 Months ago

2 is correct (Question: 110660.3 )

dav

Question:
DIRECTIONS :In the question below, there are three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the given statements. 

Statements:

Some hankie are duster.

All dusters are broom.

No broom is a wiper.


Conclusions:

I. All wiper being hankie is a possibility. 


II. All hankie being wiper is a possibility.

Options:
A) If either Conclusion I or II follows
B) If both Conclusions I and II follow
C) If neither Conclusion I nor II follows
D) If only Conclusion II follows 
E) If only Conclusion I follows
Solution:

From diagram, it is clear that only Conclusion I is true.

Knowledge Expert

· commented

· 1 Months ago

Nope....2nd can not be true at all Hankie's region is intersected by both Broom and Duster and its clearly given in the statement that No broom is a wiper. Hence, All hankie being wiper is neither possibility nor surety...

So, Only conclusion I follows...
-logo
We at aim to provide most comprehensive content & test for practice which is carefully divided into various chapters and topics to help you focus on your weak areas.Our Practice mock test gives you unmatched analytics to help you realize your strong areas,time management and improvement areas.Our Short & Crisp notes on each topic will help you to quickly revise the topic along with the tips & tricks of the exams.
More About
-Info
-Info

Mobile App

Get it on Google Play
About Us Campus Ambassador Careers Contact Us Refund Policy

All Rights Reserved Top Rankers

User Policy
Disclaimer
Terms & Conditions