Updated On : August 16, 2022
If you are aspiring for prestigious law entrance exams like CLAT, AILET, and LSAT, you cannot afford to ignore the logical reasoning as this section holds almost 20-25% weightage in these exams.
In the logical reasoning section, the questions are designed to test your critical thinking and reasoning ability skills. Therefore, having knowledge of fundamentals alone is not enough to clear this section unless there is sufficient practice.
Wondering how to study logical reasoning for Law Entrance Exams in India? We have curated tips and tricks to help you better understand how to prepare for logical reasoning for law entrance exams 2023, important topics, and more.
So, what are you waiting for!!! Follow the tips and learn short tricks to perform well in the exam.
The Syllabus for Law Entrance Exams is divided into two parts:
CLAT will have more questions from critical reasoning than analytical reasoning, while other Law Entrance Exams will have analytical reasoning questions more than critical reasoning.
Check out the table below to know the detailed Logical reasoning Syllabus for Law Entrance Exams.
Download FREE Study Material for Law Entrance Exams by LegalEdge
Analytical Reasoning | Critical Reasoning |
Data Arrangements & Puzzle Solving (linear, complex, and conditional statements), ranking Test, Input-Output | Statement & Assumptions, Syllogisms, Conditional Statements, and Hidden Propositions |
Directions, Blood Relations, Analogy, Alpha-numeric Test, Alphabet Test, Coding-Decoding, etc | Paragraph-based CR: Understanding of conclusions, Inferences, Premises, Counter-Premises, Assumptions, Strengthing, Weakening of Arguments, Flawed Reasoning, Bold-faced Statements |
Arithmetical Reasoning, Set-Theory, Clocks, Calendar, etc | Statement-based CR: Assumptions, Forcefulness of Arguments, Course of Action |
Most of you might think that the logical reasoning section is one of the most time-consuming sections in the exam. However, getting a good hold on this subject and scoring marks is not difficult.
Each one of your preparation may vary. Hence, following the Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips for CLAT and other exams will help enhance your logical skills.
It is difficult to crack the law entrance exams without prior knowledge of the syllabus and exam pattern.
Being aware of the syllabus will help you get an idea about the important topics from the exam point of view. In contrast, the CLAT Exam Pattern helps you know the number of questions from each topic, marking scheme, difficulty level, etc.
Understanding the basic concepts and gaining conceptual knowledge ought to be at the base of your Law Entrance Exam Preparation.
To identify the logic and solve questions quickly, you must make sure to enhance your basic knowledge of coding, blood relations, syllogisms, seating arrangement, directions, etc.
Once you are clear with the concepts, you can aim to attempt 35 to 37 questions from this section.
As well know, logical reasoning questions can be a little tricky. Therefore, learning simple techniques would help you manage your time while solving logical reasoning questions.
There are many books available both offline and online for law entrance exams. But, opting for the right book is most important for better results.
As per the experts at Legal Edge, you can refer to the following logical reasoning books for CLAT and other law entrance exams as these books cover all the topics as per the syllabus.
Check: Scope of Law In India
To help you get an idea about the type of questions asked in the law entrance exams, we have provided a few sample questions for your reference here.
Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy provided opportunities for many more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision not to select players from the previous World Cup for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad.
1.1 Which one of the following statements is consistent with Dravid’s selection strategy for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup, as stated above?
(a) Selecting an inexperienced team at the under-19 level ensures failure, and players who experience failure learn to be humble.
(b) Playing a sport is more important than winning or losing.
(c) The Under-19 World Cup is a stepping-stone to first-class cricket; winning it should not be the end goal.
(d) When players are under the age of 19, they do not feel stressed about playing at a World Cup; however, as they age, their ability to play well depends on the number of matches they have already played.
Enhance your preparations with the help of the Best CLAT Coaching Classes in India.
1.2 Which of the following is the most desirable outcome of Dravid’s selection strategy from his perspective?
(a) The team lost the World Cup, but 5 players from the squad went on to play first-class cricket.
(b) The team winning the World Cup, and 1 player getting selected for the national team.
(c) The team winning the World Cup, and no player getting selected for the next Under-19 World Cup team.
(d) The team winning the World Cup, and 5 players from the squad going on to play first-class cricket.
1.3 Which of the following statements, if true, contradicts Dravid’s selection strategy?
(a) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on the win-loss ratio of the team they were a part of.
(b) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their ability to cope with injuries.
(c) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their individual performances.
(d) Players who have played in international tournaments face domestic competition better than those who have not
Frequently Asked Questions
How to score good marks in Logical Reasoning Section of law Entrance Exams in India?
Is Logical Reasoning Preparation for Law entrance Exams possible in 1 month?
How to prepare for Logical Reasoning Section of the CLAT and Other Law Entrance Exam syllabus?
Will there be any comprehensive type questions in the logical reasoning section of the CLAT and other law Entrance Exams?
How can I improve my accuracy to solve Logical Reasoning section?