How to Study Logical Reasoning for Law Entrance Exams 2023 in India?

If you are aspiring for prestigious law entrance exams like CLAT, AILET, and LSAT, you cannot afford to ignore the logical reasoning as this section holds almost 20-25% weightage in these exams.

In the logical reasoning section, the questions are designed to test your critical thinking and reasoning ability skills. Therefore, having knowledge of fundamentals alone is not enough to clear this section unless there is sufficient practice.

Wondering how to study logical reasoning for Law Entrance Exams in India? We have curated tips and tricks to help you better understand how to prepare for logical reasoning for law entrance exams 2023, important topics, and more.

So, what are you waiting for!!! Follow the tips and learn short tricks to perform well in the exam.

What is the Syllabus for Logical Reasoning for Law Entrance Exams?

The Syllabus for Law Entrance Exams is divided into two parts:

• Analytical Reasoning
• Critical Reasoning

CLAT will have more questions from critical reasoning than analytical reasoning, while other Law Entrance Exams will have analytical reasoning questions more than critical reasoning.

Check out the table below to know the detailed Logical reasoning Syllabus for Law Entrance Exams.

Download FREE Study Material for Law Entrance Exams by LegalEdge

Analytical Reasoning	Critical Reasoning
Data Arrangements & Puzzle Solving (linear, complex, and conditional statements), ranking Test, Input-Output	Statement & Assumptions, Syllogisms, Conditional Statements, and Hidden Propositions
Directions, Blood Relations, Analogy, Alpha-numeric Test, Alphabet Test, Coding-Decoding, etc	Paragraph-based CR: Understanding of conclusions, Inferences, Premises, Counter-Premises, Assumptions, Strengthing, Weakening of Arguments, Flawed Reasoning, Bold-faced Statements
Arithmetical Reasoning, Set-Theory, Clocks, Calendar, etc	Statement-based CR: Assumptions, Forcefulness of Arguments, Course of Action

How to Prepare for Logical Reasoning for Law Entrance Exams in India?

Most of you might think that the logical reasoning section is one of the most time-consuming sections in the exam. However, getting a good hold on this subject and scoring marks is not difficult.

Each one of your preparation may vary. Hence, following the Logical Reasoning Preparation Tips for CLAT and other exams will help enhance your logical skills.

Know Syllabus and Pattern

It is difficult to crack the law entrance exams without prior knowledge of the syllabus and exam pattern.

Being aware of the syllabus will help you get an idea about the important topics from the exam point of view. In contrast, the CLAT Exam Pattern helps you know the number of questions from each topic, marking scheme, difficulty level, etc.

Work on Basic Concepts

Understanding the basic concepts and gaining conceptual knowledge ought to be at the base of your Law Entrance Exam Preparation.

To identify the logic and solve questions quickly, you must make sure to enhance your basic knowledge of coding, blood relations, syllogisms, seating arrangement, directions, etc.

Once you are clear with the concepts, you can aim to attempt 35 to 37 questions from this section.

Learn Time Management

As well know, logical reasoning questions can be a little tricky. Therefore, learning simple techniques would help you manage your time while solving logical reasoning questions.

• Make sure to devote at least 2 hours every day to the logical reasoning section.
• Knowing your strengths and weakness is a must to Manage your Time for the Law Entrance Exam Preparation.
• You should focus on increasing your speed of reading the passages and solving the questions while maintaining accuracy.

Apply Logic and Tricks

• You are tested on your ability to apply logic and reason. Therefore, mugging up the patterns and facts will not help you to score marks.
• The reasoning and logical ability can be developed only with practice.
• You are advised to practice puzzles and games that demand more logic.

Practice Sample Papers

• When you solve the previous year's papers, you will get a fair idea about the actual exam.
• Also, you will get an idea about the difficulty level and the type of questions asked in the exam.
• To acquaint yourself with this section, practice at least 1-2 previous year's Question Papers for CLAT and other exams.

Attempt Mock Tests

• Taking up mock tests is one of the best methods to test your preparation levels.
• With the help of mock tests, you can improve your speed and accuracy in the final exam.
• Also, you can know in which area you are weak and can put extra effort into overcoming it.
• Solve at least one Mock Test for CLAT and Other law entrance exams on a weekly basis.

Which Books Should I Consider for Logical Reasoning for Law Entrance Exams in India?

There are many books available both offline and online for law entrance exams. But, opting for the right book is most important for better results.

As per the experts at Legal Edge, you can refer to the following logical reasoning books for CLAT and other law entrance exams as these books cover all the topics as per the syllabus.

• Universal’s Logical Reasoning for CLAT, LSAT, and other Law Entrance Exams by Jain Prateek
• A Modern Approach to Logical Reasoning by RS Aggarwal
• 501 challenging Logical Reasoning Practice Book

How to Attempt Logical Reasoning Questions in Law Entrance Exams?

• The first and most important thing is to read the passage carefully
• Try to determine the tone or theme of the passage
• Be an active reader while reading the question from the passage
• It is essential to recognize the conclusions and premises in a particular passage.
• Understand the complicated parts and ask questions yourself about the passage
• Circle important keywords while reading the question. This will help you find the right answer
• There may be a lot of data in the question that may confuse you, so focus on the question and the aspect that it is based on
• Try to draw diagrams while answering the difficult questions
• Do not waste more time on a single question if you are not able to identify the correct answer
• Move to the next question - if the question is lengthy and time-consuming

Check: Scope of Law In India

Type of Questions Asked in the Logical Reasoning Section of CLAT and Other Law Entrance Exams?

To help you get an idea about the type of questions asked in the law entrance exams, we have provided a few sample questions for your reference here.

Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy provided opportunities for many more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision not to select players from the previous World Cup for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad.

1.1   Which one of the following statements is consistent with Dravid’s selection strategy for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup, as stated above?  

(a) Selecting an inexperienced team at the under-19 level ensures failure, and players who experience failure learn to be humble.

(b) Playing a sport is more important than winning or losing.

(c) The Under-19 World Cup is a stepping-stone to first-class cricket; winning it should not be the end goal.

(d) When players are under the age of 19, they do not feel stressed about playing at a World Cup; however, as they age, their ability to play well depends on the number of matches they have already played.

Enhance your preparations with the help of the Best CLAT Coaching Classes in India.

1.2   Which of the following is the most desirable outcome of Dravid’s selection strategy from his perspective? 

(a) The team lost the World Cup, but 5 players from the squad went on to play first-class cricket.

(b) The team winning the World Cup, and 1 player getting selected for the national team.

(c) The team winning the World Cup, and no player getting selected for the next Under-19 World Cup team.

(d) The team winning the World Cup, and 5 players from the squad going on to play first-class cricket.

1.3   Which of the following statements, if true, contradicts Dravid’s selection strategy? 

(a) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on the win-loss ratio of the team they were a part of.

(b) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their ability to cope with injuries.

(c) First-class cricket selectors evaluate under-19 cricketers based on their individual performances.

(d) Players who have played in international tournaments face domestic competition better than those who have not