Updated On : July 13, 2023
Reader's Digest - Welcome to our comprehensive guide on mastering LSAT Assumption Questions! Prepare to unveil clever tricks and strategies that empower you to tackle these logical challenges easily and confidently.
🔎 Picture this: You're faced with an LSAT Assumption Question, and the clock is ticking. Fear not, for we are here to equip you with the strategies that will give you the edge in cracking these mind-boggling puzzles.
These assumption questions often hide in plain sight, tempting you to make hasty assumptions. But worry not, we'll teach you how to navigate through the maze and find that golden nugget of truth buried within the options.
Our expert advice will guide you through the art of identifying unstated premises, revealing the hidden assumptions that form the foundation of the arguments.
Maximize your performance with the ultimate LSAT Logical Reasoning strategy: never leave a question behind! Tackle these questions efficiently, and don't hesitate to skip the toughest ones.
Finish all questions within 35 minutes to capture every point and avoid losing out due to distractions from earlier questions.
Now that we know the purpose of assumption questions let's delve into the top tricks and strategies to help you confidently tackle this section.
Identify the Conclusion and Premises
Spot the Gap
Use Negation Technique
Be Aware of Common Assumption Patterns
Eliminate Unrelated Answer Choices
Practice Makes Perfect
Here are some general tips and tricks which can help you deal with LSAT logical reasoning questions:
Logical reasoning’s bread and butter is evidence + assumption = conclusion. Remember to utilise keywords and critical thinking to get the answer FIRST. Then, ignoring any filler or background, ask, "Why is the conclusion true?" and identify the evidence. The assumption is absent, which the author takes for granted when deriving his or her conclusion from the data presented.
Don't Miss - Difference between CLAT and LSAT
Remember to distinguish between Sufficient Assumption and Necessary Assumption issues. Once again, we divide the input into conclusion and evidence and then forecast the assumption.
You must corroborate the assumption in the right answer options to strengthen the argument– remember, you do not have to prove the conclusion is true, only make it more plausible.
Weakening questions reject the author's assumption in the right response, making the conclusion less plausible (again, no need to refute it).
The most important things to remember are to not go beyond the boundaries of the argument and not to call evidence into question– evidence is recognized as fact on the LSAT.
The fault is the last assumption of the family question type.
All we do is locate the conclusion and proof in the stimulus and identify the author's erroneous assumption.
The main difference between a flaw and an assumption question is that the flaws are usually described in general terms in the answer choices. If the answer choices become confusing, try laying out the specifics of the argument against the general description in the answer choice; if something doesn't fit, it's not the right answer.
Also Read: LSAT Syllabus
The most common form of inquiry that does not require an argument-based stimulus. The most important thing to remember while answering inference questions is that the stimulus is not an argument with a conclusion and evidence. Thus, we must inventory the data to discover the solution.
Because the response to a typical inference inquiry must be TRUE based on the stimulus data, you should ask one question for each answer option: does it have to be true? Return to the stimulus whenever needed, and watch for formal logic.
The most frequent method for answering a principle question is identifying the principle, which means we have a particular argument in the stimulus and a general principle in the response choice.
We break down the specific argument (conclusion/evidence/assumption) and then search the response possibilities for a broader version of the assumption.
We perceive a general principle in the stimulus and specific instances in the replies in the second sub-group, applying the concept. Pay close attention to the question stem since it may ask for a case that either follows OR contradicts the concept. Finally, we have questions about parallel principles.
These are uncommon because they include both preceding activities: the stimulus has a specific argument, and the answer options contain specific arguments.
We must search the response alternatives for an argument that follows the same basic principle as the stimulus. Identify where the principle is in any principle question: answer option, stimulus, or just extracted from an argument.
When taken separately, the lesser question types aren't as essential to your score as the major hitters described above, but combined, they still carry a punch.
Ensure you're familiar with them and know what to do if you encounter one. Timed section work is an excellent way to improve at this.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there any negative marking in LSAT?
Can I apply for apply for LSAT through offline mode?
How can I prepare for the LSAT?
What is a good LSAT starting score?
How many times can you take the LSAT in a lifetime?