Updated On : September 21, 2022
Madhya Pradesh Civil Judge Mains Exam is a two-day event scheduled for 27 and 28 August 2022.
Paper 3 of the MPCJ Mains exam includes questions from the Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Evidence Act, SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, POCSO Act, NDPS Act (Chapter-3,4 & 5), and Negotiable Instrument Act.
Let’s discuss the previous 5 year paper of MPCJ Mains in this blog.
Download FREE Study Material for MP Judiciary Exam by Judiciary Gold
MPCJ Mains exam allots 20 marks to the Indian Evidence Act. It is the third most important topic of Civil Judge Mains Paper 3.
Here are some of the previous year's questions of MPCJ from the Indian Evidence Act.
Question 1) Can the credit of the witness be impeached by the party who calls him? If yes, how? Explain with examples. [2016]
Outline 1)
Question 2) When a person can prove admission in his favour? Explain with an example. [2016]
Outline 2)
Question 3) "A" tried for the murder of "B". A says to the police officer that I have buried the knife with which I committed the murder of B." He shows the place where the knife was buried. A knife is taken out. [2017]
Whether the statement with which I committed the murder of B" is admissible? Discuss? [2017]
Outline 3)
Question 4) a) Is birth during the marriage, conclusive Proof of Legitimacy? [2018]
Outline 4) a)
b)
c)
The second most important topic of Paper 3 is CrPC. It holds the highest weightage of 20 marks.
Refer to the following questions and outline an answer to revise MPCJ Mains's previous year's paper from CRPC.
Question 1) Every Offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. Examine this proposition of law. Do you think there is any exception to this rule? [2017]
Outline 1)
Question 2) What is the procedure for recording evidence in the absence of the accused? Whether the evidence adduced in the trial of co-accused can be used against the absconding accused of the same case? [2018]
Outline 2)
Question 3) Explain the circumstances in which release on bail is mandatory. [2019]
Outline 3)
Question 4) a) For what offences/accused persons, is Plea Bargaining under Chapter XXI-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure applicable? [2019]
b) Describe the guidelines provided under Section 265C of the Code of Criminal Procedure for mutually satisfactory disposition of Criminal Cases based on Plea Bargaining. [2019]
Outline 4)
a) Plea bargaining is a pre-trial negotiation between the accused and the prosecution where the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions by the prosecution. Section 265A to 265L. Chapter XXIA of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the idea of Plea Bargaining. It was inserted into the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005.
It allows plea bargaining for cases:
b) Guidelines are given under Section 265C
Negotiable Instrument Act holds the weightage of 8 marks out of 100 marks. Also, chapter 13 and chapter 17 are the most important chapters from MPCJ's Mains perspective.
Read the following previous year’s questions carefully to ace MPCJ Mains answer writing.
Question 1) How can Cognizance of Offences be taken under the Negotiate Instrument Act 1881? Explain powers along with the provision as to the court within whose local jurisdiction the offence under Section 13 shall be inquired into and tried. [2016]
Outline 1)
Powers:
Question 2) Discuss the essential ingredients of section 138 under NIA. Which defence is not allowed in any prosecution under Section 138? [2017]
Outline 2)
Question 3) What is the newly amended provision regarding interim compensation? How can an offence be compounded by the trial court and by the appellate court? [2018]
Outline 3)
Question 4) Explain the liability of the persons in case of dishonour of a cheque by a company. [2019]
Outline 4)
IPC is one of the major topics of MPCJ Mains Paper 3. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh allotted 20 marks to the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Go through the previous year's question of IPC along with the answer outline given below.
Question 1) What do you mean by Common Intention? How does it differ from Common Object? [2016]
Outline 1)
Difference between Common Intention & Common Object
Question 2) When does the offence fall under Section 304 Part I and when does it fall under Section 304 Part of IPC? Discuss. [2017]
Outline 2) Section 304 provides for the punishment for Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder.
The Section provides for punishment for 2 degrees:
Question 3) Define Criminal Intimidation. How is criminal intimidation different from extortion? [2019]
Outline 3) The offence of criminal intimidation is defined under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The provision states that anyone who threatens a person on the following grounds is liable for criminal intimidation.
The Supreme Court in the case of Vikram Johar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) has observed that the mere act of abusing a person in a filthy language does not satisfy the essential ingredients of the offence of criminal intimidation.
Difference between Criminal Intimidation and Extortion:
Question 4) Describe and distinguish between the following:
Outline 4) Abetment and Criminal Conspiracy
Giving False Evidence and Fabricating False Evidence
Frequently Asked Questions
How many vacancies are there in MPCJ?
What is the salary of civil judge in MP?
Is there any exam in Madhya Pradesh to become a Civil Judge?
September 21, 2022
Madhya Pradesh Civil Judge Mains Exam is a two-day event scheduled for 27 and 28 August 2022.
Paper 3 of the MPCJ Mains exam includes questions from the Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, Evidence Act, SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, POCSO Act, NDPS Act (Chapter-3,4 & 5), and Negotiable Instrument Act.
Let’s discuss the previous 5 year paper of MPCJ Mains in this blog.
Download FREE Study Material for MP Judiciary Exam by Judiciary Gold
MPCJ Mains exam allots 20 marks to the Indian Evidence Act. It is the third most important topic of Civil Judge Mains Paper 3.
Here are some of the previous year's questions of MPCJ from the Indian Evidence Act.
Question 1) Can the credit of the witness be impeached by the party who calls him? If yes, how? Explain with examples. [2016]
Outline 1)
Question 2) When a person can prove admission in his favour? Explain with an example. [2016]
Outline 2)
Question 3) "A" tried for the murder of "B". A says to the police officer that I have buried the knife with which I committed the murder of B." He shows the place where the knife was buried. A knife is taken out. [2017]
Whether the statement with which I committed the murder of B" is admissible? Discuss? [2017]
Outline 3)
Question 4) a) Is birth during the marriage, conclusive Proof of Legitimacy? [2018]
Outline 4) a)
b)
c)
The second most important topic of Paper 3 is CrPC. It holds the highest weightage of 20 marks.
Refer to the following questions and outline an answer to revise MPCJ Mains's previous year's paper from CRPC.
Question 1) Every Offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. Examine this proposition of law. Do you think there is any exception to this rule? [2017]
Outline 1)
Question 2) What is the procedure for recording evidence in the absence of the accused? Whether the evidence adduced in the trial of co-accused can be used against the absconding accused of the same case? [2018]
Outline 2)
Question 3) Explain the circumstances in which release on bail is mandatory. [2019]
Outline 3)
Question 4) a) For what offences/accused persons, is Plea Bargaining under Chapter XXI-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure applicable? [2019]
b) Describe the guidelines provided under Section 265C of the Code of Criminal Procedure for mutually satisfactory disposition of Criminal Cases based on Plea Bargaining. [2019]
Outline 4)
a) Plea bargaining is a pre-trial negotiation between the accused and the prosecution where the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain concessions by the prosecution. Section 265A to 265L. Chapter XXIA of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the idea of Plea Bargaining. It was inserted into the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005.
It allows plea bargaining for cases:
b) Guidelines are given under Section 265C
Negotiable Instrument Act holds the weightage of 8 marks out of 100 marks. Also, chapter 13 and chapter 17 are the most important chapters from MPCJ's Mains perspective.
Read the following previous year’s questions carefully to ace MPCJ Mains answer writing.
Question 1) How can Cognizance of Offences be taken under the Negotiate Instrument Act 1881? Explain powers along with the provision as to the court within whose local jurisdiction the offence under Section 13 shall be inquired into and tried. [2016]
Outline 1)
Powers:
Question 2) Discuss the essential ingredients of section 138 under NIA. Which defence is not allowed in any prosecution under Section 138? [2017]
Outline 2)
Question 3) What is the newly amended provision regarding interim compensation? How can an offence be compounded by the trial court and by the appellate court? [2018]
Outline 3)
Question 4) Explain the liability of the persons in case of dishonour of a cheque by a company. [2019]
Outline 4)
IPC is one of the major topics of MPCJ Mains Paper 3. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh allotted 20 marks to the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Go through the previous year's question of IPC along with the answer outline given below.
Question 1) What do you mean by Common Intention? How does it differ from Common Object? [2016]
Outline 1)
Difference between Common Intention & Common Object
Question 2) When does the offence fall under Section 304 Part I and when does it fall under Section 304 Part of IPC? Discuss. [2017]
Outline 2) Section 304 provides for the punishment for Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder.
The Section provides for punishment for 2 degrees:
Question 3) Define Criminal Intimidation. How is criminal intimidation different from extortion? [2019]
Outline 3) The offence of criminal intimidation is defined under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The provision states that anyone who threatens a person on the following grounds is liable for criminal intimidation.
The Supreme Court in the case of Vikram Johar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) has observed that the mere act of abusing a person in a filthy language does not satisfy the essential ingredients of the offence of criminal intimidation.
Difference between Criminal Intimidation and Extortion:
Question 4) Describe and distinguish between the following:
Outline 4) Abetment and Criminal Conspiracy
Giving False Evidence and Fabricating False Evidence
Frequently Asked Questions
How many vacancies are there in MPCJ?
What is the salary of civil judge in MP?
Is there any exam in Madhya Pradesh to become a Civil Judge?