July 15, 2026
Overview: If you're preparing for MPCJ mains exam, judgement writing is a component you cannot ignore. As a future judge, your ability to draft well-reasoned, concise, and legally sound judgments is an important skill that will take you to the other side of the selection process.
In this blog, we help you with some important MPCJ judgement writing tips, rules, and more.
First things first,
If you don't know the rules of chess, you can't play it. Similarly, if you aren't well-versed in the core criminal statutes and procedure, judgment writing will be an uphill task in the MPCJ Mains.
Before you attempt judgment writing, you should be comfortable with the Mains descriptive component mentioned in MP Judiciary Syllabus, and thorough with:
Since July 1, 2024, the three new criminal codes govern offences committed on or after that date, while the earlier codes continue to apply to older matters. MPCJ Mains question papers can set the offence date anywhere — so you need to be fluent in both.
|
Old Provision |
New Provision |
What It Covers |
|
IPC, 1860 (substantive offences) |
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 |
Definitions of offences and punishments |
|
CrPC, 1973, Section 354 |
BNSS, 2023, Section 393 |
Language and contents of judgment |
|
IEA, 1872, Sections 6-8 (relevancy/conduct) |
BSA, 2023, Sections 4-6 |
Relevancy of facts and conduct as evidence |
Rule of thumb: Cite whichever code governs the offence date given in your question paper, and state that code explicitly in your judgment. Don't assume the examiner wants only the new Sanhitas.
A well-structured criminal judgment typically includes nine components. Use this table as your quick-reference map before you start judgement writing practice in detail below.
|
Component |
What to Write |
Errors to Avoid |
|
Title & Court Details |
Case title, court name, date |
Omitting the class of Judicial Magistrate |
|
Introduction |
Brief background, nature of dispute |
Writing too much narrative detail here |
|
Issues Framed |
The legal points for determination |
Vague or missing issues |
|
Facts of the Case |
Concise summary of material facts |
Copying the fact pattern verbatim instead of summarising |
|
Arguments Presented |
Both parties' arguments, briefly |
One-sided or missing defence arguments |
|
Applicable Laws |
Statutes, provisions, relevant principles |
Citing the wrong code (old vs new) |
|
Analysis & Reasoning |
Logical application of law to facts |
Stating a conclusion without reasoning |
|
Decision |
Final finding, with reasons |
Missing reasons for sentence, as required under Section 354 CrPC / 393 BNSS |
|
Order |
Penalty, compensation, or directions |
Excessive or arbitrary fine/compensation amounts |
Keep these formatting conventions in mind. MPCJ examiners check whether you can follow procedure correctly under time pressure, not whether you write beautifully.
Under exam pressure, students preparing for the MPCJ Mains exam tend to repeat the same errors. Watch out for these mistakes:
See how toppers write MP Judiciary answers to understand how these small formatting details translate into actual marks.
Judging was never meant to be easy; it's a skill built through repetition. Below is the complete structure to follow.
Describe the incident as presented by the prosecution, including key details and any witnesses mentioned.
Present the defence's version of events and any explanation offered by the accused.
For a broader view of scoring technique, also see how to write answers for the Judiciary Mains exam.
This is the most important part of the judgment. You are evaluating and weighing each piece of evidence.
|
Type |
Label Format |
|
Prosecution Witness |
PW-1, PW-2 |
|
Defence Witness |
DW-1, DW-2 |
|
Exhibit |
Ex-1, Ex-2 |
This is your decision on guilt or innocence. If guilty: write "to be suspended temporarily" (as per format convention) pending sentencing. If not guilty: write "the accused be set at liberty."
The operative portion sets out the concrete consequences of your finding. Cover:
Add the signature line with date and designation, followed by "(Judgment Pronounced in Open Court)."
Simply write this as a label, there's no need to draw a seal or stamp.
Re-read your judgment against the checklist in the last section of this blog before you consider it complete.
Always check the updated MCJ exam pattern for exam duration and format. This will help you do timed practice.
MPCJ Mains tests several distinct descriptive skills. It's necessary to know how judgment writing differs from the other two, since aspirants often blur the three together.
|
Aspect |
Judgement Writing |
Essay Writing |
Answer Writing |
|
Format |
Fixed, procedural structure |
Free-flowing, structured argument |
Structured but flexible, issue-based |
|
Basis |
A given hypothetical case file |
A given topic/theme |
A given legal question |
|
What's Evaluated |
Procedural accuracy, correct labelling, reasoning |
Clarity of thought, articulation |
Legal knowledge, application, structure |
|
Personal Opinion |
Not applicable — must follow facts given |
Encouraged, within reason |
Occasionally, in analysis sections |
For essay-specific technique, see important essay topics for judiciary exam.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much time should I allocate to the judgment writing paper in MPCJ Mains?

What happens if I don't specify the class of Judicial Magistrate?

Should I write the actual name of the judge or examiner?

Can I refer to case laws in my MPCJ judgment writing answer?

Is judgment writing only about criminal law in MPCJ Mains?

How is judgment writing different from charge framing?

What are the most common reasons students lose marks in judgment writing?

SHARE