December 14, 2025
Overview: AILET PG 2026 was conducted on 14th December 2026 for admission into the LL.M. program. The AILET LLM 2026 paper was difficult; it tested conceptual clarity, interlinking of legal provisions, and applied understanding across subjects. Read the blog to know about the detailed AILET PG 2026 analysis provided by our LEAC experts.
Our LEAC experts have provided a detailed post-exam overview, including the difficulty level and answers to all questions. Use this to analyse your performance in the AILET PG Exam 2026 quickly!
One of the most important takeaways from this year’s AILET LLM paper is the absence of any fixed or limited syllabus. The unexpected inclusion of CPC and IBC as independent, clearly identifiable areas came as a shock to many aspirants, especially since these subjects had not been asked in this manner in earlier AILET LLM papers. The paper drew questions from around 29 different subjects, making it clear that AILET does not operate within a narrow or predefined subject boundary.
This wide subject spread is precisely what made the paper highly unpredictable. Aspirants who prepared selectively, assuming that only a few core subjects would dominate, found themselves at a disadvantage. Instead, the paper rewarded those with broad-based preparation and conceptual flexibility. With such a large number of subjects being touched, trend-based preparation lost its reliability, reinforcing the reality that AILET PG demands comprehensive legal awareness rather than syllabus-centric study.
| Exam | AILET PG 2026 (LL.M.) |
|---|---|
| Conducting Body | National Law University, Delhi (NLU Delhi) |
| Exam Date & Slot | 14 December 2025 (2:00 PM – 4:00 PM) |
| Mode | Offline (Pen & Paper) |
| Pattern Snapshot | Objective, Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) |
| Marking Scheme | Negative marking: -0.25 for each incorrect answer |
| Core Law Areas Tested | Constitution, Jurisprudence, Administrative Law, Contract, Torts, Criminal Law, IPR, Company/Commercial, PIL/International Law, Family, Labour, Environmental Law, Interpretation of Statutes, and allied areas. |
Based on recent-year trends, a candidate’s “good attempts” depend on the paper’s difficulty and the directness of the questions. Once the exam analysis is live, we will replace the ranges below with the actual exam-day benchmarks.
Subject Trend & Weightage
● Constitutional Law had a limited presence with around 8-12 MCQs, focusing mainly on interpretation, institutional roles, and doctrinal clarity. While the questions were conceptually framed, the subject did not dominate the paper this time; it played a more balanced role rather than serving as the backbone of the exam.
● Criminal Law (BNS, BNSS and BSA) was steady and predictable, Conceptual and Statement-based as well.
● Jurisprudence tested depth rather than definitions. Thinkers, theories, and conceptual elimination mattered more than memory.
● The question contained a mix of minor laws like the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013, JJ Act 2015 and Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021, etc.
● Other subjects that appeared in the paper included Administrative Law, Contract Law, Tort Law, Company Law, Transfer of Property Act, Intellectual Property Rights, Labour Law, Family Law, Environmental Law, Public International Law and Consumer Protection Law, etc. There were a total of 29 subjects from which questions were asked, making it unpredictable.
The Surprising Factor: CPC & IBC
1. Civil Procedure Code (CPC) – A Silent Shock
One of the biggest surprises of this paper was the clear and independent presence of CPC.
● CPC questions were not incidental or mixed casually
● They tested:
○ Appeals and jurisdiction
○ Procedural bars
○ Powers of courts
This is significant because CPC has largely been ignored or barely touched in previous AILET LLM papers. For many aspirants who sidelined CPC assuming it was “CLAT-centric,” this became a ranking differentiator.
2. Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) – Unexpected but Clear Signal
Another standout surprise was the noticeable presence of IBC.
● Earlier AILET papers either avoided IBC or asked it very indirectly.
● This year, IBC appeared as a standalone commercial law subject, not merely an extension of Company Law.
This signals a shift towards contemporary commercial legislation, reflecting real-world legal relevance.
What This Paper Was Actually Testing
Ability to apply procedural law
Comfort with modern economic and commercial statute
Firm conceptual grounding, not section cramming
Reading comprehension combined with legal reasoning
The paper clearly separated:
● Well-rounded LLM aspirants from those preparing selectively based on old trends
Length and Comparisons:
Overall Difficulty:
Question Types:
Sale of Goods Act:
Constitutional Law:
Criminal Law Insight:
Evidence Act Trends:
POSH (Prevention of Harassment Act):
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR):
Labour Law:
Check Now: AILET PG Result
Key Difference: While both exams were of similar difficulty, AILET PG 2024 introduced unexpected topics, whereas AILET PG 2025 was more predictable.
Key Difference: Both exams were not lengthy, but AILET PG 2024 had more emphasis on straightforward questions from bare acts.
Key Difference: The cut-off for AILET PG 2026 is expected to remain stable, while AILET PG 2024 saw a slight increase due to its complexity.
Conclusion: AILET PG 2025 was comparatively easier and more predictable, while AILET PG 2024 tested candidates with unexpected topics and heavier emphasis on certain areas like constitutional law. Both papers required a solid grasp of core legal concepts, but AILET PG 2025 offered a smoother experience overall.
This section offers a comparative analysis of the AILET PG exam papers from 2023 and 2024, highlighting key differences and similarities that can provide valuable insights for future AILET PG takers.
Check: AILET PG Seat Intake 2026
Below are the AILET LLM Exam Analysis 2023 key points received by candidates who took the examination last year.
The student poll showed us that the AILET PG paper was lengthy.
| Sections | Number of Questions |
| English | 25 |
| Legal Reasoning | 25 |
| Subjective | 10 (Answer any 2) |
English had questions from fill-in-the-blanks, antonyms etc., appearing in section A.
The legal Reasoning pattern was slightly different since the principle of act-based questions was not asked in this section. Questions from the Contract Act, Transfer of property act, the law of torts etc., were asked.
Check: AILET PG & PhD Question Papers
The highlights below provide a detailed AILET PG exam analysis for 2023, based on feedback from students and insights from LegalEdge After College experts.
Changed Exam Pattern:
Exam Structure:
Time Management Strategy:
Question Nature:
Good Score Benchmark:
Cut-off Predictions:
Descriptive Questions:
1. CPC & IBC can no longer be ignored for AILET PG
2. Pure constitutional and jurisprudence prep is necessary but not sufficient
3. Procedural + commercial laws are emerging as rank-deciding areas
4. AILET PG has no limited or fixed syllabus — this year’s paper covered around 29 different subjects, making it one of the most unpredictable papers in recent years.
We wish all AILET PG 2026 aspirants the very best. To everyone who gave it their all, take pride in the effort you put in. The journey doesn’t end here, and your hard work will surely take you forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can I expect AILET LLM exam answer keys?

What was the difficulty level of the AILET PG paper 2026 ?

What will be the expected cut off for AILET LLM Exam 2026?

Will AILET LLM 2026 Exam lengthy this year?

What's a good attempt in AILET PG 2026?

Is AILET 2026 tougher than CLAT 2026?

SHARE