How LegalEdge Mocks Help Students Balance Speed & Depth in NLSAT

Summary: Speed and depth feel like opposites in NLSAT prep.

• Speed is what gets you through the paper.

• Depth is what keeps your accuracy alive when options start looking “almost correct”.

Most students don’t actually lose marks because they’re bad at English or reasoning. They lose marks because they choose the wrong mode at the wrong time: reading too deeply when a question is easy, or reading too quickly when the question is designed to punish assumptions.

That’s the real job of a good mock series: not to “be tough”, but to train the switch—when to skim, when to slow down, and when to walk away.

Download FREE Study Material for NLSAT by LegalEdge

Why NLSAT forces this trade-off (it’s built into the paper)

Part A is passage-driven. The official sample describes 8–10 general comprehension passages, roughly 500 words each, with a total of 75 MCQs that blend English comprehension, current affairs context, and critical reasoning.

And the marking scheme makes the dilemma sharper:

• +1 for correct

• -0.25 for wrong

• -0.25 even for unattempted

That means you’re constantly managing three risks at once:

1. taking too long,

2. getting it wrong,

3. leaving it blank.

On top of that, the NLSAT Exam Pattern is a single paper with two parts, typically within a fixed overall duration (official programme information indicates 150 minutes).

So, speed without depth becomes reckless, and depth without speed becomes incomplete.

What “speed” and “depth” actually mean in NLSAT terms

Though different in meaning, they both lay the foundation for amazing scores on the NLSAT. Let's dig deeper into their actual meaning:

Speed (the useful kind)

Not “reading fast” as a talent—but moving efficiently:

• identifying the passage’s main claim quickly

• spotting where evidence sits

• knowing when a question is asking for proof vs best inference

• cutting time loss on low-ROI questions

Depth (the marks-saving kind)

Not “overthinking”—but justifying:

• checking whether an option is supported vs merely reasonable

• catching small qualifier words (only, most, primarily, always)

• distinguishing author’s view vs a reported view

• testing assumptions in argument-style questions

Balancing speed and depth is basically balancing confidence and proof.

How LegalEdge mocks are built to train this balance

Without relying on gimmicks, the mocks built by LegalEdge help you understand the exam better.

1) We design passages to create “realistic fatigue”, not random difficulty

NLSAT isn’t hard because every passage is brutal. It’s hard because the mix drains you:

• one passage that’s smooth but has tricky options

• one that’s dense but has more direct questions

• one that feels familiar but tempts you into assumption-based answers

So mocks are built with controlled variation—so you learn:

• when to maintain speed

• when to slow down because the passage is doing heavy conceptual lifting

This mirrors the official sample’s idea of passage-driven General Comprehension with integrated question types.

2) We put “decision points” into the paper on purpose

A lot of prep advice says: “Attempt everything.” But with -0.25 for both wrong and unattempted, your real skill is choosing which questions deserve your time and certainty.

So mocks include:

• a few questions that are solvable in 30–45 seconds (high ROI)

• a few that are solvable but time-expensive (medium ROI)

• a few that are designed to trap rushed readers (low ROI unless you’re calm)

Over time, you stop treating every question as equal.

3) Options are written to reward proof, not vibes

The easiest way to make a mock “feel hard” is to write confusing options. That’s also the fastest way to make practice useless.

Instead, the goal is tight, defensible options:

• two options sound plausible

• one option is actually provable from the passage

• the wrong one fails on a single logical step (overreach, wrong scope, wrong cause)

This is where depth gets trained naturally: you don’t “go deep” everywhere—only when the option-pair demands it.

4) Explanations teach the switch: when to skim vs when to slow down

A mirror mock isn’t complete without solutions that show how to think under time.

So we structure solutions around:

• what line/idea to anchor on

• what the question is truly asking (inference? best supported? assumption?)

• why the tempting distractor fails

That trains a repeatable habit: confirm quickly when it’s easy, justify carefully when it’s close.

5) We train attempt strategy around the marking reality (including blanks)

Because leaving a question blank can cost you (-0.25), mocks help you build a personal “attempt threshold”:

• If you can eliminate 2 options confidently, attempt.

• If you can eliminate 1 option and you’re unsure, park it and return.

• If you can’t eliminate anything, don’t donate time—donate that question.

This is not guesswork. It’s controlled decision-making.

6) Post-mock analysis is designed as “speed-depth diagnosis”

After each mock, the point isn’t just “how many marks did I get?”

We push students to diagnose:

• Slow + correct: depth is fine, speed needs structure.

• Fast + wrong: speed is fine, depth discipline is missing.

• Slow + wrong: you’re over-investing in the wrong steps (usually option testing without passage anchoring).

• Fast + correct early, wrong later: fatigue curve + rushing at the end.

Once you name the pattern, you can fix it.

Where Part B fits into speed vs depth (it’s not “extra”, it’s a different muscle)

The official sample describes Part B as:

• 10 short legal aptitude/reasoning answers (within 150 words each)

• 1 current affairs essay (up to 500 words)

Part B is where depth becomes structure:

• You can’t write “deeply” if you can’t organise.

• You can’t write “fast” if you don’t have a framework.

So NLSAT Mocks by LegalEdge help by forcing:

• a clear issue → rule/norm → application → conclusion chain

• short paragraphs and clean reasoning under a tight word cap

• essay outlines that don’t waste words on generic introductions

It’s speed and depth again—just in writing form.

Practical routines: how to use mocks to build both speed and depth

If you’re accurate but slow

Do this:

• Time-box passages: 7–9 minutes each (including questions) for training days

• Force yourself to move on after the time box

• In analysis, redo the same passage untimed and compare:

  • Which questions needed depth?

  • Which ones do you over-read?

Goal: same accuracy, less time.

If you’re fast but inconsistent

Do this:

• Add a “proof rule”: before finalising any answer, point to the exact line/idea supporting it

• Track a “temptation log”: questions where you picked the option that sounded right

• Practice elimination discipline: why each wrong option is wrong (one sentence)

Goal: same speed, higher certainty.

If you’re both slow and inconsistent

Start with:

• fewer passages per session (2–3), but ruthless analysis

• learn one repeatable method (don’t chase 10 strategies)

• focus on accuracy first, then add time pressure

Goal: build a stable base before speed.

Common mistakes mocks expose (and how to correct them)

1. Reading the passage like a story (instead of like an argument)
   Fix: after each paragraph, ask: “claim, evidence, implication?”

2. Answering from memory instead of text
   Fix: never choose without anchoring the option back to a line/idea.

3. Getting stuck on one “ego question”
   Fix: treat time as marks. Move on and return only if you have surplus time.

4. Writing long in Part B to sound smart
   Fix: structured answers beat fancy language. Word caps reward clarity.

Why this balance matters even more because of the evaluation process

NLSIU’s published programme information indicates that Part B evaluation happens for a limited pool based on Part A performance (for the 3-year LLB programme, it has been described as evaluation in a 1:5 ratio based on Part A performance).

So Part A demands smart speed-depth decisions to get you into the right bracket—and Part B demands structured depth to convert that opportunity into rank.