Logo Icon

CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper & Answer Key PDF Download & Difficulty Analysis

Author : Mrunali Gaikwad

July 11, 2026

SHARE

Overview: If you're preparing for CLAT PG 2027, previous year question paper practice should be one of the most important inclusions in your study plan. In this blog we share the CLAT PG 2025 question paper with answer key.  

  • CLAT PG runs as a single integrated paper. Every question is a passage-based application of core LL.B. subjects.  
  • Practicing previous year papers helps you understand how questions appear in the exam while subject weightage keeps changing every year.  

Along with the question paper PDF, we have also shared a brief analysis and how to use this paper to prepare for the next CLAT PG cycle. Let's begin!  

Download CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper and Answer Key PDF  

Download the CLAT PG 2025 question paper and final answer key here: 

CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper Analysis  

Here's a quick overview of the CLAT PG 2025 question paper:  

Particulars  

Details  

Total Questions 

120 (118 scorable after revision) 

Total Marks 

Originally 120; recalibrated to 118 

Duration 

2 hours  

Question Type 

Comprehension-based MCQs 

Passages  

24 

Mode 

Offline  

How Difficult Was the CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper? 

Post-exam feedback and candidate reporting placed CLAT PG 2025 as relatively balanced compared to some other recent years. It was notably manageable than the 2024 and 2026 papers, which leaned harder into dense constitutional interpretation and longer analytical passages.  

What made CLAT PG 2025 comparatively manageable:  

  • Even subject distribution rather than a heavy skew toward one or two areas 
  • Standard principle-based questions, the kind that reward solid conceptual grounding over lateral thinking 
  • Moderate passage length, long enough to test comprehension without becoming a time trap 
  • Fewer deliberately ambiguous options: the "two right-sounding answers" trap that shows up in tougher years was less frequent  

Remember: CLAT PG's difficulty has oscillated year to year. It was moderate in 2025 and tougher in 2024 and 2026 which itself is a pattern worth planning around. Prepare for the harder version of the exam; a balanced paper on the day is a bonus, not a baseline.  

Subject-wise Difficulty Analysis for CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper  

Here's a detailed subject-wise difficulty analysis based on CLAT PG 2025 question paper:  

Subject  

Weightage Trend  

Important Topics  

Constitutional Law 

Highest single-subject share, consistently 

Fundamental Rights, Basic Structure Doctrine, judicial review, recent constitutional amendments 

Jurisprudence 

Second largest; together with Constitutional Law forms roughly a third to half the paper 

Austin, Hart, Kelsen; Natural Law vs. Legal Positivism; Rights Theory 

Criminal Law 

Moderate-to-high 

Core IPC/BNS provisions, exceptions, punishment framework, usually tested through applied fact patterns 

Contract Law 

Moderate 

Essentials of a valid contract, breach and remedies, framed as scenario-based questions 

Torts 

Moderate 

Strict/absolute liability, defences, landmark tort cases 

Family Law 

Lower-moderate 

Marriage, divorce, maintenance provisions across personal laws 

Company & IPR Law 

Lower 

Basic corporate governance concepts; patent/copyright/trademark fundamentals 

Public International Law 

Lower 

Sources of international law, treaties, state recognition 

Environmental & Labour Law 

Lower 

Landmark environmental doctrines (polluter pays, precautionary principle); core labour welfare legislation 

If you only have three months to cover CLAT PG 2027 syllabus and need to pace up, Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence alone will move your score more than any other topics.  

But this is just a pattern. You don't know which topics may get the most share on the question paper. We have a detailed list of important topics for CLAT PG that you should check. 

How to Use the CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper to Prepare for the Next Exam Cycle?  

Here are a few tips so you make the best use of the CLAT PG 2025 question paper for your preparation.  

  • Attempt it cold, under real exam conditions. No notes, no phone, strict 2-hour timer. Your first honest attempt is the only one you get. 
  • Score it with the actual marking scheme. +1/-0.25, not a flat percentage. This changes how a score feels and forces you to internalize the real cost of guessing. 
  • Sort every wrong answer into one of three buckets: conceptual gap, misread question, or time pressure. These need three completely different fixes that could be more revision, slower reading, or better pacing respectively. 
  • Build a subject-wise accuracy map using the weightage table above. If you're getting Constitutional Law questions wrong, that's a bigger red flag than getting Environmental Law questions wrong, simply because of how much more of the paper Constitutional Law represents. 
  • Go back to source material, not just explanations. If you missed a Basic Structure Doctrine question, don't just read why the answer is correct. Reread the actual constitutional provision and the case it comes from. CLAT PG rewards this kind of depth. 
  • Re-attempt the same paper in 3-4 weeks. Not to memorize answers, but to measure whether your reasoning speed has improved, which is a different skill from remembering right answers. 
  • Layer in 3-5 years of papers, not just this one. A single year shows you a snapshot. Multiple previous year papers show you a pattern and patterns are what CLAT PG 2027 exam pattern will resemble.  

Mistakes to Avoid When Practicing CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper or Other PYPs  

Here are the most common mistakes that aspirants make and you need to avoid when practicing CLAT PG previous year papers:  

  • Treating the paper as a question bank instead of a diagnostic. Memorizing that "the answer to Q47 was C" teaches you nothing that transfers to CLAT PG 2027. Understanding why it was C does. 
  • Solving without a timer, then feeling falsely confident. Untimed accuracy and timed accuracy are not the same skill, and CLAT PG punishes the gap between them harshly. 
  • Skipping the negative marking in self-scoring. Candidates who score themselves out of "number correct" rather than applying -0.25 consistently overestimate their readiness by 10–15 marks. 
  • Ignoring wrong answers that were "close calls." A guess that happened to be right is more dangerous to your preparation than a guess that was wrong. It hides a gap that could have been improved. 
  • Solving only the most recent paper. One year shows you an outcome. Five years show you a trend. Aspirants who only work with the latest paper miss recurring structural patterns across years. 
  • Not revisiting the same paper later. Solving a paper once and moving on wastes its diagnostic value. The second attempt, weeks later, is often more informative than the first.  

Here are the key takeaways:  

  • The CLAT PG 2025 question paper is one of the most reliable practice resources available for CLAT PG 2027 aspirants.  
  • It shows you exactly how the Consortium tests Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, and the rest of the LL.B. syllabus in a passage-based, application-first format.  
  • Use it as a diagnostic, not just a read-through: attempt it under timed conditions, score it honestly, and let the results shape the next month of your study plan. 

Frequently Asked Questions

When was the CLAT PG 2025 exam conducted?

Expand Faq Icon

How many questions were there in the CLAT PG 2025 paper?

Expand Faq Icon

What was the marking scheme for CLAT PG 2025?

Expand Faq Icon

Where can I download the CLAT PG 2025 question paper with answer key PDF?

Expand Faq Icon

Is the CLAT PG 2025 paper useful for CLAT PG 2027 preparation?

Expand Faq Icon

What was the difficulty level of CLAT PG 2025?

Expand Faq Icon

Which subjects carry the highest weightage in CLAT PG?

Expand Faq Icon

Is there any official passing score for CLAT PG?

Expand Faq Icon

About the Author

Faculty
Mrunali Gaikwad

Full Stack Content Writer

I am a writer and researcher with 8 years of experience in content creation, aspiring to further expand my knowledge and experience within the law and judiciary sectors.... more