Separation of Powers: What is Legislature, Executive and Judiciary?

Overview: Separation of powers involves distributing the governmental functions of legislation, execution, and judiciary among distinct and autonomous entities.

The legislative branch is responsible for creating laws, the executive branch enforces these laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws and ensures they are applied fairly and justly.

If you are in the flied of law, a lawyer, preparing for Judiciary or doing anything related to the filed of law or constitution then you must understand the difference between legislative, executive, and judiciary.

In this blog we will cover:

• What is the Doctrine of Separation of Powers
• The Origin of Separation of Powers
• Separation of Powers and Overlap Between Judiciary and Executive

Download FREE Notes for Judiciary by Judiciary Gold

What is the Doctrine of Separation of Powers?

The doctrine of separation of powers refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. This system is designed to ensure that these branches operate independently and do not encroach upon one another's functions.

• Legislature: Responsible for making laws.
• Executive: Charged with implementing and enforcing the laws.
• Judiciary: Tasked with interpreting the laws and administering justice to ensure the laws are upheld.

Know more: Everything About Judiciary Exams

Download Union and Its Territory Notes by Judiciary Gold

The primary purpose of this separation is to prevent any single branch from wielding excessive power, thereby reducing the risk of arbitrary governance. By distributing powers among different bodies, it mitigates the potential for misuse or concentration of power, ultimately protecting society from the arbitrary and irrational use of state authority.

The concept of separation of powers entails dividing the roles of government into three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch operates independently: the Legislature enacts laws, the Executive implements these laws, and the Judiciary interprets the laws and ensures their enforcement.

This division is designed to prevent any single entity from accumulating excessive power, thereby limiting the potential for government overreach. Additionally, it serves as a safeguard against the abuse of power, protecting society from the state's arbitrary and capricious authority.

Learn more: Judiciary Exam 2024 Online Coaching

Download Constitution Overview Notes by Judiciary Gold

The Origin of Separation of Powers

The doctrine of separation of powers, a cornerstone concept for modern governance, was first comprehensively articulated by the French philosopher Montesquieu in his work "The Spirit of Laws" in 1748. Drawing inspiration from the British system of governance, Montesquieu proposed that freedom is best preserved through a distinct division of governmental powers.

This theory was later operationalized in the United States with the drafting of the Constitution, which explicitly delineates governmental powers across three articles: Article I assigns legislative powers, Article II vests executive powers in the President, and Article III establishes an independent judiciary.

Echoing these principles, the framers of the Indian Constitution engaged in robust debates about incorporating a similar division of powers. This culminated in Article 50 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which mandates the separation of the judiciary from the executive in public services, reflecting a commitment to clear and distinct boundaries within the government’s structure.

The Constitution of India articulates the separation of powers among the three branches of government—the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary—while also allowing for some functional overlaps to maintain checks and balances. Here is a table outlining the key provisions related to the separation of powers and overlaps between the legislature and executive:

Organ	Provision	Description
Legislature	Article 79	Establishes Parliament as the legislative body.
	Articles 107-117	Details the functioning and powers of Parliament.
Executive	Article 74	Establishes the Council of Ministers, with the Prime Minister as the head of the Real Executive.
	Article 53	Vests the executive power of the union in the President, who is also an integral part of Parliament.
	Article 75	Stipulates that every Minister should be a member of Parliament, illustrating the parliamentary system.
	Article 123	Allows the President to promulgate ordinances when Parliament is not in session, enabling the executive to legislate temporarily.
Overlap	Delegated Legislation	Allows Parliament to delegate its legislative powers to the Central or State Governments for rule-making purposes.

Know More: Why solving previous year's question papers is important

Download Important CPC Questions by Judiciary Gold

These provisions illustrate the intricate balance and interaction between the legislative and executive branches, which are designed to prevent the concentration of power and ensure a system of governance that operates under the principle of checks and balances.

The Constitution of India delineates and sometimes overlaps the functions of the judiciary and the executive to ensure checks and balances within the system. Below are tables summarizing the key provisions that govern the separation and overlap of powers between these two branches:

Table on Separation of Powers and Overlap Between Judiciary and Executive

Aspect	Provision	Description
Separation	Article 50	Mandates the state to separate the judiciary from the executive in public services.
	Criminal Procedure Code 1973	Enacted to separate the judiciary and the executive, following the directive in Article 50.
Overlap	Article 361	Grants immunity to the President and Governors from court proceedings, illustrating a special executive privilege.
	Article 72	Empowers the President with clemency powers, which can alter judicial decisions, showing a functional overlap with judicial roles.
	Articles 323A and 323B	Establish tribunals that include both judicial and executive members to dispense justice, blending the roles of both branches.
	District Magistrate as Returning Officer	Acts in a quasi-judicial capacity during election processes, such as scrutinizing nomination papers.

Get Details: Why Reading Bare Acts is necessary for Judiciary 

Download FREE 6 Month Judiciary Strategy by Judiciary Gold

Table on Separation of Powers and Overlap Between Judiciary and Legislature

Aspect	Provision	Description
Separation	Article 121	Prohibits Parliament from discussing the conduct of judges in the discharge of their duties, maintaining judicial independence.
	Article 122	Bars courts from inquiring into the proceedings of Parliament, ensuring legislative freedom from judicial review.
Overlap	Article 61	Gives Parliament quasi-judicial powers during the Presidential impeachment process, a blend of legislative and judicial functions.
	Judicial Activism	Occurs when the judiciary takes on legislative functions, as seen in the establishment of the Vishaka Guidelines.
	Public Interest Litigation	Allows for judicial creation of policy in response to public needs, exemplified by the People’s Union for Democratic Rights case.

Know more: How to prepare for judiciary exams 

Download Toppers Strategy to make notes by Judiciary Gold

Key Judicial Pronouncements on Separation of Powers in India

• Ram Jawaya Kapoor vs State of Punjab (1955): Established that the Indian Constitution does not enforce a rigid separation of powers but clearly demarcates the functions of the government's branches.
• Golak Nath vs State of Punjab (1967): Highlighted that each government organ should operate within its constitutional limits, acknowledging implicit boundaries.
• Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975): Reinforced that the separation of powers is part of the Constitution's Basic Structure, invalidating clauses that exempt high offices like the Prime Minister from judicial review.
• Kartar Singh vs State of Punjab (1994): Affirmed the distinct roles of the legislature, executive, and judiciary as outlined by the Constitution, emphasizing adherence to constitutional boundaries.

Get Details: Books for Judiciary Mains Exams 

Download Limitation Act notes by Judiciary Gold

Instruments of Checks and Balances

Legislative Control:

• On Judiciary: Possesses the authority for impeachment and removal of judges, and can amend laws that the Court has declared unconstitutional, thereby revalidating them.
• On Executive: Can dissolve the government through a no-confidence vote and scrutinize executive actions during parliamentary sessions, particularly during question hour and zero hour.

Executive Control:

• On Judiciary: Responsible for making judicial appointments, including the Chief Justice and other judges.
• On Legislature: Holds powers under delegated legislation and can make rules for regulating the legislature's procedure and conduct of business, as permitted by the Constitution.

Judicial Control:

• On Executive: Engages in judicial review, assessing the constitutionality of executive actions.
• On Legislature: Upholds the doctrine that certain core principles of the Constitution are unamendable, as established in the Kesavananda Bharati Case of 1973.

Know about: Life and Other Benefits of a civil judge

Download CPC notes by Judiciary Gold

Issues with the Separation of Powers

Weakened Opposition in India:

• The principle of checks and balances prevents democracy from descending into majoritarianism. In a parliamentary system, this role is typically filled by the opposition.
• However, a dominant majority by a single party in the Lok Sabha has reduced the effectiveness of the opposition, impacting the robustness of these checks and balances.

Judiciary's Aversion to Checks and Balances:

• The Supreme Court deemed the 99th constitutional amendment, which aimed to establish the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), as ultra vires (beyond legal authority).
• The NJAC was intended to ensure judicial independence, improve appointment quality, enhance fairness in selection processes, promote diversity in judicial appointments, and restore public confidence in the judiciary.

Know: How to prepare for the Judicial Services Exam

Judicial Activism:

• Recent judgments from the Supreme Court have shown a trend of hyper-activism, where decisions encroach upon the legislative and executive domains by setting precedents that function as laws.

Executive Excesses:

• Allegations of excessive centralization of power within the executive branch, weakening public institutions, and enacting laws that ostensibly bolster law and order and state security but simultaneously restrict freedom of expression.

Download Sales of Goods Act Notes by Judiciary Gold

What is Executive, Legislature & Judiciary

In the framework of Indian governance, "Legislature" and "Executive" refer to two separate branches of government, each with its own defined roles and responsibilities. The distinction between the Legislature and the Executive in India lies in their primary functions.

The Legislature is charged with the creation of laws and regulations, whereas the Executive is responsible for implementing and enforcing these laws. This division of responsibilities helps ensure effective government operation and maintains a system of checks and balances among the different branches.

What is a Legislature?

A legislature is an essential element of a democratic system, charged with the responsibility of drafting and implementing laws. It serves as a venue where elected representatives engage in discussions, debate policies, and develop legislation that mirrors the will of the citizens.

Union Legislature The Parliament of India, known as the Union Legislature, is divided into two chambers: the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). Members of the Lok Sabha are directly elected by the general population, ensuring that the legislative body represents the national electorate. The Rajya Sabha's members are selected by the legislative assemblies of the various states and union territories, catering to regional interests.

State Legislature In India, State Legislatures may either be unicameral or bicameral. Unicameral legislatures consist solely of a Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha). Bicameral systems, however, include both a Legislative Assembly and a Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad). Members of the Legislative Assembly are chosen directly by the public. Members of the Legislative Council, on the other hand, are selected through several methods: some are elected by the Legislative Assembly members, others by specific groups such as graduates and teachers, and some are appointed.

What is the Executive?

The executive branch is tasked with the execution and administration of laws and policies established by the legislature. This branch includes both elected officials and bureaucratic staff who work together to ensure the effective implementation of laws.

Union Executive The Union Executive consists of the President, the Vice President, the Prime Minister, and the Council of Ministers. The President serves as the ceremonial head of state and possesses specific discretionary powers. The Prime Minister, as the head of government, wields the primary executive authority and is assisted by the Council of Ministers in managing the day-to-day operations of governance.

State Executive At the state level, the executive is made up of the Governor, who functions as the ceremonial head of the state, similar to the President at the national level. The Chief Minister, supported by the Council of Ministers, handles the actual governance and administrative duties. The Chief Minister's role is comparable to that of the Prime Minister, bearing the responsibility for state-level executive functions.

Download FREE Independence of Judiciary Notes by Judiciary Gold

What is Judiciary?

The judiciary, comprising the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, and subordinate courts, is responsible for interpreting laws. The Supreme Court acts as the final court of appeal in the country.

Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed by the President as per Article 124(2) of the Constitution, following consultations with senior judges from relevant courts. The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench in Re Presidential Reference, AIR 1999 SC 1, clarified the standards and procedures for these consultations, which are necessary for appointing and transferring judges between the Supreme Court and High Courts.

The judiciary's primary role is to interpret the Constitution and ensure that laws and administrative actions are in compliance with constitutional mandates. It also protects the fundamental rights of individuals, as guaranteed by the Constitution. Citizens can approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 and the High Courts under Article 226 through writ jurisdiction to seek remedies for violations of their rights.

While interpreting and applying legislative acts, the judiciary also oversees the administration of justice, including the management and regulation of lower courts. Although the legislature has the power to impeach judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts for misconduct or incompetence, such instances are exceedingly rare.

Conclusion:

The theory of separation of powers must be evaluated not solely on its literal interpretation but in the context of its underlying purpose. To fully understand its implications, it is essential to adopt a broad perspective and consider it within the expansive framework of modern phenomena such as privatization, anarchy, and globalization.

It is restrictive and inadequate to view this theory merely as a method for categorizing governmental functions in a rigid manner. Instead, it should be embraced in a spirit that promotes unity, collective improvement, and the overall well-being of the populace.

The concept might seem incompatible with literal application, yet it can effectively function by focusing on the established checks and balances that ensure good governance and help prevent the abuse and manipulation of power across various government sectors. It is observed that nations often do not adhere strictly to this doctrine due to its practical challenges.

In India, the separation of powers serves as a mechanism to oversee and coordinate the activities of the three branches of government, contributing to the robust functioning of its democracy. While the doctrine is integral to the Constitution, its application should be flexible, allowing for the dynamic interplay of governmental functions that adapts to the needs and challenges of contemporary governance.