CEED 2024 Question Paper PDF Download (Part A & Part B) with Solutions

Resource

Download

CEED 2024 Question Paper PDF

CEED 2024 Answer Key

Component

Details

Exam Mode

Computer-based examination (Part A on computer, Part B answered in booklet)

Duration

3 Hours (Part A: 1 Hour + Part B: 2 Hours)

Part A Marks

150 Marks

Part B Marks

100 Marks

Total Marks

250 Marks

Question Types

NAT (Numerical Answer Type), MSQ (Multiple Select Questions), MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions), Sketching, Creativity, Visual Communication, Form Development, Problem Identification

Skills Tested

Observation, Visual Reasoning, Spatial Ability, Design Aptitude, Creativity, Sketching, Visual Sensitivity, Form Sensitivity, Communication Skills, Problem Solving, Design Thinking, Human-Centered Design

Section

Question Type

No. of Questions

Marks

Section I

NAT

8

32

Section II

MSQ

10

40

Section III

MCQ

26

78

Total

—

44 Questions

150 Marks

Question

Focus Area

Marks

Q1

Sketching

20

Q2

Creativity

20

Q3

Visual Sensitivity

20

Q4

Form Sensitivity

20

Q5

Problem Identification

20

Total

-

100 Marks

Area

Topics Asked (Actual Questions from CEED 2024)

Difficulty

Visual Reasoning

Paper folding and unfolding, cube and 3D object visualization, top-view identification, shadow analysis, pattern completion, image transformations, perspective understanding, rotational symmetry, object reconstruction from fragments.

Moderate to Difficult

Logical Reasoning

Sequence completion, pattern-based reasoning, analytical interpretation of visual data, relationship mapping, elimination-based logic questions, and inference-based problem solving.

Moderate

Design Aptitude

Product usability, ergonomics, design awareness, material properties, mechanism understanding, visual communication principles, everyday product analysis, and design decision-making scenarios.

Moderate

Observation

Counting and identifying visual elements, spotting subtle differences between images, object arrangement analysis, hidden-pattern recognition, visual matching, and attention-to-detail questions.

Moderate

General Awareness

Design-related knowledge, products and inventions, visual culture, architecture, design terminology, materials, and basic awareness of creative disciplines.

Easy to Moderate

Question Type

Actual Question Breakdown

Skills Tested

Difficulty

Sketching

Q1: Draw a sequence showing a child attempting to lift a heavy toy box. The sketch had to depict the struggle, effort, body posture, and progression of actions through multiple frames.

Human figure drawing, observation, body language, sequential sketching, visual storytelling

Moderate

Storytelling / Creativity

Q2: Create a visual narrative using a character with a cube-shaped head. Candidates had to develop an engaging interaction or situation while maintaining consistency of the character throughout the story.

Creativity, storytelling, imagination, character development, visual communication

Moderate

Visualization / Communication Design

Q3: Design an ornamental wordmark by transforming a given word into a visually appealing typographic composition while maintaining readability.

Typography, composition, visual sensitivity, communication design, aesthetics

Moderate

Form Sensitivity

Q4: A three-dimensional geometric form was provided. Candidates had to transform it into a functional furniture design while preserving key characteristics of the original form.

Form exploration, product design, spatial visualization, creativity, functional thinking

Difficult

Design Problem Solving

Q5: Identify design-related problems in a rural kitchen environment and visually communicate practical solutions through sketches and annotations.

Observation, empathy, user-centered design, problem identification, design thinking

Difficult

Communication

Multiple questions required candidates to communicate ideas visually without relying heavily on text, including storytelling, typography, furniture design, and problem-solving tasks.

Visual communication, clarity of thought, presentation skills

Moderate to Difficult

Rank

Topic

Questions Seen

1

Visual Reasoning

Very High

2

Observation

Very High

3

Spatial Ability

High

4

Perspective

High

5

Product Understanding

Moderate

6

Design Awareness

Moderate

7

Storytelling

Moderate

8

Typography

Moderate

9

Form Development

Moderate

10

Problem Identification

Moderate

Factor

CEED 2024

CEED 2025

Part A Difficulty

Moderate to Difficult

Difficult

Part B Difficulty

Moderate to Difficult

Difficult

Observation

Focused on visual observation through picture analysis, hidden-part identification, animation frames, perspective, and spatial interpretation.

Observation became more application-oriented through product analysis, dispenser mechanisms, chair manufacturing, scissors ergonomics, and real-world object interpretation.

Visualization

Strong emphasis on paper folding, perspective views, stamp transformations, cross-sections, cube arrangements, and spatial reasoning.

Visualization became significantly harder with 3D rotations, object reconstruction from views, profile identification, shadow formation, and advanced spatial transformations.

Design Thinking

Primarily appeared in Part B through furniture design and rural kitchen problem-solving.

Present throughout the paper. Even Part A included questions on usability, mechanisms, manufacturing processes, ergonomics, and product functionality.

Product Awareness

Limited. Questions mainly tested materials, toys, seat belts, gliders, and simple mechanisms.

Much stronger focus. Candidates were expected to understand dispensers, scissors, furniture, manufacturing methods, hinges, valves, joints, and product behavior.

Design Knowledge

Included traditional art forms, materials, animation principles, photography, transportation signs, and basic manufacturing awareness.

More industrial-design oriented with manufacturing processes, product mechanisms, ergonomics, material selection, assembly systems, and functional analysis.

Logical Reasoning

Mostly pattern completion, shape transformation, visual puzzles, sequencing, and arrangement-based questions.

Logical reasoning became more analytical, involving story graphs, rotational transformations, tile assemblies, folding logic, and mechanism-based reasoning.

Question Types

Dominated by visual reasoning, image-based puzzles, perspective drawing concepts, animation principles, and observation tasks.

Noticeably broader. Included user-product interaction, manufacturing awareness, ergonomics, mechanical systems, product design analysis, and functional reasoning.

GK / Design Awareness

Traditional painting styles, materials, transportation signs, animation studio practices, and design awareness.

Less direct GK and more applied design knowledge. Candidates needed practical understanding of products, processes, and real-world design decisions.

Part B Focus

Storytelling, typography, furniture design, sketching, visual communication, and rural problem-solving.

Greater emphasis on design thinking, user-centered solutions, communication of ideas, observation-based sketching, and creative problem-solving.

Time Pressure

High but manageable for well-prepared candidates.

Higher than 2024 due to longer analytical questions and increased decision-making required in Part A.

Ideal Candidate Profile

Strong visual thinker with good sketching and observation skills.

Balanced designer with visualization skills, product awareness, design thinking, and analytical reasoning abilities.

Factor

CEED 2022–2023

CEED 2024

Observation

Tested primarily through pattern recognition, visual counting, hidden forms, shape identification, motion analysis, and image interpretation. Candidates mostly needed sharp visual attention and spatial accuracy.

Observation became more contextual and design-oriented through image analysis, animation frames, seat-belt mechanisms, toy movements, visual storytelling, and real-world object interpretation.

Visualization

Strong emphasis on geometry, orthographic views, folding, cube manipulation, shadows, sectional views, transformations, and spatial puzzles. Most questions had a clear right or wrong answer.

Visualization remained important but became more applied. Questions involved perspective understanding, bicycle assemblies, object stacking, paper cups, pixel shifts, and 3D-form interpretation rather than purely geometric exercises.

Design Awareness

Focused on ergonomics, accessibility, user-centered design, mechanisms, product functionality, interface design, and everyday design situations. Questions were present but relatively limited in number.

Design awareness became noticeably stronger. Candidates were expected to understand animation production, traditional art forms, vehicle movement, material usage, transportation systems, and functional products.

Creativity

Creativity was tested mainly in Part B through sketching, storytelling, concept generation, and visual communication. Part A remained largely analytical.

Creativity started blending with observation and interpretation. Even objective questions required candidates to think visually and connect design concepts with practical situations.

Problem Solving

Dominated by logical reasoning, mathematical thinking, mechanical puzzles, quantitative analysis, and structured problem solving. Many questions resembled aptitude-based challenges.

Shifted toward design problem solving. Candidates had to understand systems, user interactions, movement, assembly logic, and product behavior rather than only solving abstract puzzles.

Communication

Mostly restricted to Part B where candidates expressed ideas through sketches, narratives, and design concepts.

Greater emphasis on interpreting visual information and communicating design intent. Part B increasingly rewarded clarity of thinking and visual storytelling rather than only artistic skill.

What To Do

Why It Helps

Timed Solving

Attempt the complete CEED 2024 question paper under actual exam conditions (1 hour for Part A and 2 hours for Part B). This helps improve speed, decision-making, and time management.

Mock Simulation

Treat the paper like a real CEED exam. Avoid interruptions, follow the official pattern, and evaluate your performance honestly to identify readiness levels.

Error Analysis

Review every incorrect or skipped question. Identify whether mistakes came from weak observation skills, poor visualization, logical errors, or lack of design awareness.

Sketching Practice

Reattempt Part B questions and focus on improving sketch clarity, storytelling, visualization, and communication rather than artistic perfection.

Compare with Recent Papers

Study CEED 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 papers together to identify recurring themes in observation, design thinking, visualization, and problem-solving. This reveals how the exam is evolving and what skills IIT Bombay is prioritizing.

Skill

Evidence from CEED 2024

Importance

Observation

Multiple image-based questions

Very High

Spatial Ability

Folding, perspective, visualization

Very High

Design Thinking

Rural kitchen problem, furniture design

Very High

Creativity

Storytelling and character tasks

High

Sketching Quality

Important but not enough alone

Moderate

Design Awareness

Supporting role

Moderate

Candidate Type

How the CEED 2024 Paper Helps

Beginners

Provides a clear introduction to the CEED exam pattern, question formats, difficulty level, and the skills evaluated in Part A and Part B.

CEED 2026 Aspirants

Helps understand recent CEED trends, especially in observation, visual reasoning, design aptitude, and design thinking.

CEED 2027 Aspirants

Builds strong fundamentals early and exposes students to the types of creative and analytical challenges commonly seen in CEED.

Design Students

Strengthens visualization, communication, sketching, storytelling, product understanding, and user-centered design skills.

Self-Preparing Candidates

Acts as a reliable self-assessment tool for identifying strengths, weaknesses, and areas that need focused improvement.

Repeat Aspirants

Helps refine exam strategy, improve time management, and address recurring gaps in observation, creativity, and problem-solving.