November 22, 2025
Summary: Want to know the real CEED cut off 2026 and how it affects your chances at IIT admissions? This blog gives you the complete picture - category-wise cut-offs, CEED Part A cut off, how IIT CEED 2026 cut off marks are calculated, past year trends, and expert tips to stay above the safe score zone.
If you’re aiming for postgraduate design programmes at IITs and top institutes, the CEED 2026 cut off is the first challenge you must clear.
As per the CEED exam pattern 2026, it's a two part exam: Part-A (computer-based objective section) and Part-B (pen & paper based subjective drawing & design section). Only candidates who meet the Part-A qualifying cut off (shortlisting threshold) get their Part-B answer books even evaluated.
That means Part-A is a gate, not just a score. Understanding how the CEED cut off is calculated, what category-relaxations exist, and how to target and achieve crucial marks is the fastest way to convert effort into a shortlist and eventually admission.
The official CEED 2026 brochure is out with official rules to calculate results and this guide explains them step-by-step, in simple language with examples, historical trends and actionable strategy.
Latest Updates:
CEED Part-A is used to shortlist candidates for evaluation of Part-B. A candidate must meet the CEED Part A cut off (δ) to have Part-B evaluated.
The CEED brochure defines the Part-A cut-off formula for the General (Open) category as:
δ = μ + (σ / 2)
where,
μ = mean of Part-A marks (across all candidates)
σ = standard deviation.
Reserved categories have relaxed cut offs:
OBC-NCL & EWS cut-off = 0.9 × δ
SC/ST/PwD cut-off = 0.5 × δ.
Final CEED score (for ranking) is a weighted combination:
Final score = 0.25 × (Part-A marks) + 0.75 × (Part-B marks).
Which means,
|
CEED Part A |
25% weightage in final score |
|
CEED Part B |
Huge 75% weightage in final score |
Note:
CEED 2026 is expected to follow the updated format:
Part A (Objective): 200 marks
Part B (Design & Drawing): 100 marks
Total marks: 300
With increased preparation across aspirants and widening interest in design fields, the CEED cut off 2026 is likely to shift slightly.
| Category | Expected Part A Cut Off (2026) |
|---|---|
| General (GEN) | 55 - 60 |
| OBC-NCL | 50 - 55 |
| SC/ST/PwD | 28 - 32 |
More applicants will push up cut‐offs slightly.
If Part A remains algorithmic/visual heavy, shortlisting may tighten.
Strong performance in Part B design/drawing will play critical role since cut offs filter more.
News from CEED 2025 reported:
|
Particulars |
Value |
|
Mean |
45.48 |
|
Standard Deviation |
16.98 |
These are the official statistics released with the results. Using the formula:
|
Category |
Cut Off Calculation |
|
GEN |
δ = 45.48 + (16.98 / 2) = 45.48 + 8.49 = 53.97 |
|
OBC-NCL/EWS |
0.9 × δ = 0.9 × 53.97 ≈ 48.57 |
|
SC/PwD |
0.5 × δ = 0.5 × 53.97 ≈ 26.99 |
Check: CEED Eligibility 2026- Age Limit & Educational Qualification
Following is the step-by-step process to check CEED cut off 2026, when it's released by the conducting body after the exam:
1. Visit the Official CEED Website
2. Find the Latest CEED Notification
3. Login to Candidate Portal
4. Check Institute-wise Final Cut Offs
Must-know: What is the Difference Between UCEED and CEED? Check Complete Guide
Below is a practical table mapping real drivers of CEED cut-offs to likely outcomes - useful for setting targets and reading the room each year.
|
Factor (2026) |
How it’s measured/defined |
Likely impact on Part-A cut-off |
Likely impact on Final (A+B) admissions cut-off |
Why this happens |
|
Paper difficulty (Part-A) |
Overall toughness of NAT/MSQ/MCQ |
Harder paper → lower μ & σ → lower δ; Easier → higher δ |
Indirect (since A contributes 25% to final) |
δ is derived from μ & σ of Part-A. |
|
Distribution of scores (μ, σ) in Part-A |
Year’s mean (μ) & std-dev (σ) |
Higher μ or σ → higher δ; lower μ/σ → lower δ |
Minor |
δ is computed from μ and σ. |
|
Number of applicants |
Total test-takers |
Minimal effect on δ (data-driven) |
Higher competition → tighter closing ranks at IITs |
More qualified candidates raise the bar at counselling |
|
Seat matrix by institute/programme |
Total seats & category split at IITB/IITD/IITG/IITH/IITI/IITR/IIITDM |
No effect on δ |
Fewer seats → tougher closing ranks; more seats → slightly relaxed |
Admissions are supply–demand driven |
|
Category relaxations |
0.9× and 0.5× multipliers |
Lowers δ for reserved categories by rule |
Shapes category-wise closing ranks |
Policy fixed in brochure. |
|
Part-B evaluation standards |
Manual evaluation + rubric |
No effect on δ |
Large effect (B has 75% weight) |
Final score: 0.25A + 0.75B. |
|
Normalisation / any rubric tweaks announced |
Brochure updates |
Could alter δ logic if formula changes |
Could alter final score combining |
Always check current brochure. |
|
Test-centre logistics/anomalies |
Rare reschedules/errata |
Typically none |
Typically none |
Uncommon, but policy-driven if any |
Instead of a fixed mark every year, CEED uses a dynamic threshold tied to the exam’s cohort performance. This approach:
1. Adapts to paper difficulty: If the paper is tougher overall (lower μ), the cut-off lowers accordingly.
2. Accounts for spread: σ captures how varied scores are; a broader spread increases δ to reflect that year's performance distribution.
3. Keeps shortlisting consistent: The formula ensures a predictable shortlist size relative to cohort statistics.
Understanding this helps you realize that improving your relative rank (not just raw marks) matters - competing candidates’ performance alters δ.
1. Part-A (objective): Shortlists candidates. Part-A of CEED syllabus includes questions on visualization, numerical & analytical ability, design sensitivity and general awareness. The Part-A cut-off is statistical and mandatory to get your Part-B evaluated.
2. Part-B (subjective): Carrying 75% weight in the final score (vs. 25% for Part-A), it evaluates freehand drawing, creativity, and design ability. Once shortlisted, your Part-B performance largely determines final ranking.
3. Implication for preparation: Treat Part-A as a strict qualifier (must clear) and Part-B as the domain to differentiate and score high.
The absolute Part-A qualifying marks change year to year - we have identified reported ranges roughly around the 40-55 mark band for the general category in recent years (because μ/σ varied). And similar values are expected for CEED 2026 exam as well, unless extreme changes in the exam pattern or difficulty level.
|
Category |
Past Year CEED Cut Off Range (2024-2025) |
2023 CEED Cut Off |
|
GEN |
50-55 |
28-30 |
|
OBC-NCL/EWS |
45-50 |
25-28 |
|
SC/PwD |
25-28 |
14-16 |
Note: As per reports over the past years (2023-2025), the CEED cut off for 2024 and 2025 ranged from 25-50, which was significantly higher than 2023 cut-off in the range of 14-28. This was because the average marks and standard deviation varied a lot from 2023 to 2024.
1. Changes in Exam Pattern:
|
Criteria |
2024 |
2023 |
|
Total Part-A marks |
150 |
100 |
|
Negative marking for MSQ questions |
-1 for wrong answers |
-0.2 for wrong answers |
|
Total number of questions in Part-A |
44 |
41 |
2. Change in Difficulty level of the exam:
Due to sudden change in exam pattern and associated unpredictability, it directly impacted the average scores in 2024.
3. Change in total number of candidates:
As per a general year-on-year observation, around 500-1000 more candidates are expected to appear for the exam every subsequent year.
4. Number of available seats (seat intake):
There was a shift in the total number of seats in participating IITs and IIITs.
Check: CEED Fee Structure 2026: Check Step-wise Process & Application Fees
Part A cut off is a qualifying threshold for Part B; Final CEED cut off is what effectively decides admissions.
|
Aspect |
Part A cut-off |
Final cut-off |
|
Purpose |
Shortlist for Part-B evaluation |
Decides rank & admission outcomes |
|
When applied |
Immediately after Part-A |
After Part-B is scored & combined |
|
How it’s calculated |
μ and σ of Part-A in that year; category relaxations:
|
Combined score (A&B weighting), seat matrix, category rules. Final Score = 0.25 × Part-A marks + 0.75 × Part-B marks |
|
If you miss it… |
Part-B is not evaluated; no rank |
You might miss admission to your preferred CEED colleges |
Once the cut off is announced, the CEED conducting body (IIT Bombay) releases the result and scorecards.
The scorecard contains:
After the CEED result, candidates must apply separately to each institute offering M.Des admission through CEED.
Major institutes include:
Each institute issues its own admission notification, eligibility criteria, and deadlines.
Each participating institute decides its own shortlisting cut off for calling candidates to the next rounds. Shortlisting is usually based on:
Institutes may release category-wise shortlisting lists on their websites.
Shortlisted candidates are invited for the next stages, which usually include:
1) Portfolio Review: Candidates present their design work, projects, sketches, or creative assignments. This helps assess creativity and design skills.
2) Written/Studio Test: Some institutes conduct additional design aptitude tests or studio-based tasks to test observation, visualization, and problem-solving ability.
3) Personal Interview (PI): A face-to-face or online interview to evaluate design thinking, motivation, and subject knowledge.
The exact process varies by institute, so candidates must carefully follow each institute’s admission guidelines.
Institutes prepare a final merit list based on:
Category-wise reservation rules (GEN, OBC-NCL, EWS, SC, ST, PwD) are strictly applied while preparing the final admission list. Selected candidates receive official admission offers from the institutes.
Candidates offered admission must confirm their acceptance by paying the admission fee within the deadline. Failure to do so may result in the seat being allotted to the next candidate in the waiting list. Once confirmed, candidates proceed with document verification and enrolment in the M.Des program.
Refer: Best material to prepare for CEED
Each institute that accepts CEED 2026 scores (IISc, some IITs for M.Des/PhD/other programs) sets additional criteria for admission (e.g., minimum CEED score, interview or portfolio). CEED shortlisting is a national filter - IIT CEED cut off for admissions may be higher depending on institute competitiveness and seat counts.
Always check the target institute’s admission brochure for institute-level cutoffs and selection process.
CEED 2026 cut off qualified students are eligible to apply for the M.Des and PhD programmes in various CEED colleges with the specializations mentioned in the table below. Details of these programmes may be obtained from the websites of these respective institutes:
|
CEED Colleges |
Programmes |
|
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, IISc Bangalore |
|
|
IDC School of Design, IIT Bombay |
|
|
Department of Design, IIT Delhi |
|
|
Department of Design, IIT Guwahati |
|
|
Department of Design, IIT Hyderabad |
|
|
XR Design, IIT Jodhpur |
M.Des in XR Design |
|
Design Programme, IIT Kanpur |
|
|
Department of Design, IIT Roorkee |
M.Des in Industrial Design |
|
Design Discipline, IIITDM Jabalpur |
M.Des in Design |
|
School of Interdisciplinary Design & Innovation, IIITDM Kancheepuram |
M.Des in Integrated Product Design, PhD in Design |
Note: Since 2025, IIT Bombay abolished the joint seat allotment process for CEED, shifting to a system where candidates apply directly to individual participating institutes.
1. Prioritize Part-A topics that repeat:
Visualization & spatial ability, analytical reasoning, design sensitivity, basic numeracy - these yield faster marks in time-bound settings.
2. Target accuracy, not blind attempts:
MCQs have negative marking; MSQ/NAT have different marking rules. Practise to minimize careless errors on MCQs.
3. Timed sectional mocks:
Part-A is 1 hour; train with strict timers so you know when to skip and return. Analyze time per question and drop low-yield attempts.
4. Use official Part-A candidate response and draft answer key (when released):
Review errors and learn exact scoring pattern, CEED releases candidate responses and draft keys for a short window. Use them for direct feedback.
5. Practice NAT questions carefully:
NAT (numerical answer type) require exact answers; accuracy here is crucial because there’s no negative marking but an incorrect numeric yields 0.
Given Part-B holds 75% weight for final ranking:
First target: Secure Part-A comfortably (get above typical δ estimates). Spend ~40% of study time on Part-A topics until you can clear practice cutoffs.
Then shift to Part-B: Part-B requires artful practice: freehand sketching, ideation, composition, annotation. Use the remaining 60% of your prep time to build a strong Part-B portfolio (timed full sketch sessions, thumbnails, storyboards).
Check: CEED Eligibility 2026- Age Limit, Exam Fee & Educational Qualification
Clearing the cut off and scoring well increases the chances of admission to IITs like Bombay, Delhi, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Roorkee, Kanpur, and IIITDM Jabalpur.
These institutes carry strong brand value and recognition. Graduating from them significantly enhances career opportunities in:
Alumni networks and campus placements in such institutes often open doors to global design careers.
Admission into IITs or other CEED institutes often means exposure to:
Missing this exposure due to not clearing the CEED cut off may limit a student initially to smaller colleges or self-learning paths. However, many designers still build successful careers with strong portfolios, even without IIT tags.
A degree from IITs via CEED is often considered prestigious in India and abroad. Recruiters in product design, UX, UI, and HCI fields recognize IIT graduates as highly skilled designers. Clearing the cut off and securing admission can therefore accelerate career growth and open doors to leadership roles in design firms, startups, and even global tech companies.
Meeting or exceeding the cut off boosts confidence, it validates preparation and design aptitude. Missing the cut off, while discouraging, often motivates students to refine their skills, build stronger portfolios, and return stronger in the next attempt. This resilience itself shapes better designers.
1. Run 8-12 timed Part-A mocks and measure mean score & stability. Aim to be comfortably above the historical δ range.
2. Build a daily Part-B routine: 30-60 minute sketching blocks, weekly full 2-hour sessions.
3. Download CEED past papers & official brochure; know the marking scheme (NAT/MSQ/MCQ specifics).
4. Keep copies of category certificates ready (if applicable) - institute verification requires documentary proof.
The CEED 2026 cut off is a statistical gate that protects the quality of candidates progressing to Part-B evaluation. To beat it, your CEED preparation should be smart: master Part-A to clear the gate and then invest heavily in Part-B for the actual rank.
Use official CEED documents (brochure, result page, cut off pdf) for exact numbers and keep your goals flexible around the μ/σ logic. With disciplined mocks, careful time management and focused Part-B practice, you can turn the CEED cut off from an obstacle into a predictable checkpoint on your path to a top design programme.
Need professional guidance to crack CEED 2026? Join India's most trusted CEED Online Coaching 2026 by Creative Edge today!
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CEED Part-A cut off fixed every year?

Does clearing CEED Part-A 2026 guarantee admission?

Where can I download the CEED cut off pdf?

How is final CEED 2026 score computed?

SHARE