November 4, 2026
CAT 2026 Slot 1 Analysis: CAT 2026 Slot 1 takes place on Sunday, 29 November 2026, from 8:30 AM to 10:30 AM, and IIM Indore conducts the exam. The paper follows the CAT pattern of 68 questions across VARC, DILR and QA, with 40 minutes for each section. In recent CAT papers, the overall difficulty sits between moderate and moderately difficult, DILR is usually the toughest section, and overall good attempts fall in the range of 35 to 42 questions.
Key Takeaways
The morning session of CAT 2026 runs from 8:30 AM to 10:30 AM, and this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis breaks down what the paper asks of you: the difficulty level of each section, the number of good attempts, the topic-wise distribution of questions in VARC, DILR and QA, and what a given raw score is likely to mean in percentile terms.
Our CAT faculty attempt the Slot 1 paper section by section under timed conditions and cross-check their ratings against responses from students who write the slot. Where students and faculty disagree on difficulty, we say so. The section-wise figures, memory-based questions and student reactions on this page update as soon as Slot 1 ends.
Why does Slot 1 get read more closely than the other two? Because it's the first data point of the day. Slot 2 and Slot 3 candidates read it between sessions, percentile estimates start from it, and the "is it tougher than last year?" debate begins here. So we keep this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis specific. Every rating below comes with the reason behind it.
Here's the Slot 1 paper in one table, based on the CAT pattern and difficulty trends from recent papers. The section-wise breakdown that follows explains each number.
| Section | Total Questions | Time | Difficulty Level (Recent Trend) | Good Attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARC | 24 | 40 minutes | Moderate to moderately difficult | 14–17 |
| DILR | 22 | 40 minutes | Moderately difficult to difficult | 9–12 |
| QA | 22 | 40 minutes | Moderate to moderately difficult | 11–14 |
| Overall | 68 | 120 minutes | Moderate to moderately difficult | 35–42 |
| Exam date | 29 November 2026 (Sunday) |
| Slot 1 timing | 8:30 AM to 10:30 AM |
| Conducting institute | IIM Indore |
| Mode | Computer-based test |
| Section order | VARC, then DILR, then QA |
| Sectional time limit | 40 minutes per section |
| Marking scheme | +3 for a correct answer; −1 for a wrong MCQ; no negative marking for TITA questions |
| Total marks | 204 |
For reference, CAT 2025 also had 68 questions (24 in VARC, 22 in DILR, 22 in QA) with a 40-minute sectional time limit, so aspirants walk into Slot 1 with a well-known structure. The surprises, when they come, are in question types and difficulty, not in the format.
If CAT 2026 Slot 1 follows recent papers, the overall difficulty sits between moderate and moderately difficult. VARC is usually moderate, with readable but dense passages. DILR is the most demanding section in most recent years, and QA ranges from moderate to moderately difficult depending on how much Algebra and Geometry the paper carries. Because CAT normalises scores across slots, a tougher slot does not by itself put its candidates at a percentile disadvantage.
| Section | Recent CAT Trend | CAT 2025 Slot 1 |
|---|---|---|
| VARC | Moderate | Moderate to moderately difficult |
| DILR | Moderately difficult to difficult | Moderately difficult to difficult (toughest section) |
| QA | Moderate to moderately difficult | Moderate to moderately difficult |
| Overall | Moderate to moderately difficult | Moderate to moderately difficult |
On exam day you see the same slot called "moderate" on one site and "moderate to difficult" on another. Both can be honest. The gap comes from what each analyst is measuring.
We separate two things that exam-day chatter tends to mix up. Conceptual difficulty is whether a well-prepared student knows how to approach the question. Time intensity is how long the question takes even after you know the approach. A mixtures problem can be conceptually easy and still cost four minutes of calculation. A geometry question that hinges on one construction is quick if you see it and nearly impossible if you don't.
The difficulty ratings in this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis follow this scale:
| Rating | What it means in a 40-minute section |
|---|---|
| Easy | Most questions have a clear entry point; a well-prepared student can attempt a large share of the section without guesswork. |
| Moderate | A clear set of doable questions exists, but finding them takes deliberate selection. |
| Moderate to Difficult | Doable questions are fewer and hidden among lengthy or trap-heavy ones; selection decides the score. |
| Difficult | Even strong students leave most of the section; a handful of correct answers separates percentiles. |
One more thing. A student's own sense of difficulty is shaped by how the section went for them. Someone who picks the wrong DILR set first calls the section "very tough" even if two other sets are straightforward. That's why we weigh faculty attempts and student responses together rather than going by first reactions alone.
The VARC section has 24 questions. In recent CAT papers, 16 of them come from Reading Comprehension across four passages and 8 from Verbal Ability. The section is usually moderate in difficulty. RC passages draw from philosophy, economics, science, history and culture, and the VA portion includes para jumbles, para summaries, odd-sentence-out and para completion questions. Good attempts in VARC are around 14 to 17 at 80 to 85 percent accuracy.
Overall VARC difficulty: Moderate to moderately difficult (recent CAT trend)
VARC difficulty in CAT rarely comes from vocabulary. It comes from argument-driven passages where the author's position shifts mid-way, and from answer options that paraphrase the text almost equally well. A student who reads for the author's stance rather than for facts usually finds the section more manageable than the first reading suggests.
In VARC, the passage topic is a weak predictor of difficulty. A passage on philosophy of science can be manageable if the author's argument is linear, while a passage on a familiar topic can be brutal if two options paraphrase the text almost equally well. So in this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis, we rate each passage twice: once for how hard the text is to read, and once for how hard the options are to separate.
| Question Type | Number of Questions (Recent Trend) | MCQ / TITA | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 16 | MCQ | Moderate to moderately difficult |
| Para Jumbles | 2–3 | TITA | Moderate |
| Para Summary | 2 | MCQ | Moderate |
| Odd Sentence Out | 1–2 | TITA | Moderate to moderately difficult |
| Para Completion / Sentence Placement | 1–2 | MCQ | Moderately difficult |
| Total | 24 | Mostly MCQ | Moderate |
| Theme | What Makes It Tricky |
|---|---|
| Philosophy and ethics | Abstract arguments and authors who critique a view before presenting their own |
| Economics and policy | Cause-and-effect chains where one wrong link changes the inference |
| Science and technology | Unfamiliar terms that look harder than the actual argument |
| History, culture and art | Long narrative stretches with the main point buried in one or two lines |
| Psychology and sociology | Options that sound reasonable in general but aren't supported by the passage |
The best starting passage is rarely the first one on screen. Scan the opening lines of all four, start with the passage whose argument you can follow in one read, and keep the densest one for last.
Para jumbles in CAT are usually built around one mandatory pair, a pronoun or a linking idea that ties two sentences together. Find that pair first, and the sequence often falls into place. Para summary questions reward the option that captures the whole paragraph, not just its most striking line. Odd-sentence-out questions test whether you can spot the sentence that shares the topic but breaks the argument.
A practical note on TITA verbal questions: in the CAT pattern, TITA questions carry no negative marking. Leaving a para jumble blank is a straight loss of an opportunity. If you have even a partial sequence (say you're sure of one mandatory pair), entering your best answer costs nothing.
| Attempts | Accuracy | Approximate Net Score |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 85% | 43 |
| 16 | 85% | 38 |
| 14 | 80% | 31 |
| 12 | 80% | 26 |
Net scores assume every attempt is an MCQ with +3 for a correct answer and −1 for a wrong one; wrong TITA answers cost nothing, so actual scores can be slightly higher.
Accuracy changes VARC scores more than most students expect. Take an illustrative case of 16 attempts. At 80 percent accuracy you have roughly 13 correct and 3 wrong, for about 36 marks. At 90 percent, it's roughly 14 or 15 correct and 1 or 2 wrong, for about 41 to 43 marks. Same attempts, close to a 6-mark gap, which in VARC can be a few percentile points. That's why we'd rather see you attempt fewer questions you've actually read closely than guess on the last passage.
Start with the passage you can follow, attempt every para jumble, and stop guessing on RC once you're down to two close options with no textual support for either. In recent CATs, students who protect accuracy in VARC tend to score better than those who chase all 24 questions.
The DILR section has 22 questions, usually spread across four to five sets of four to six questions each. In recent CAT papers, it is the toughest section, rated moderately difficult to difficult. Sets typically cover arrangements, scheduling, games and tournaments, and data tables with missing values. Good attempts in DILR are around 9 to 12 questions, which roughly means solving two to three sets completely with high accuracy.
Overall DILR difficulty: Moderately difficult to difficult (recent CAT trend)
DILR sets in CAT are hard for two reasons. Constraints are long and often hide one critical condition in the last line, and many sets need case-building with several branches before anything resolves. The sets that turn out easiest are usually the ones where one or two fixed clues lock the rest of the grid quickly.
| Set Type | What Makes It Hard | Selection Tip |
|---|---|---|
| Linear and circular arrangements | Multiple valid cases until late in the set | Attempt if there are two or more fixed positions |
| Scheduling and allocation | Overlapping conditions across days, slots or people | Good pick when the grid size is small |
| Games and tournaments | Hidden assumptions about points and match outcomes | Attempt if the scoring rule is simple |
| Data tables with missing values | Calculation load and back-solving | Often the most reliable set for quant-strong students |
| Venn and set-based puzzles | Overlaps that are easy to double count | Attempt if three or fewer categories are involved |
| Routes, networks and quant-based puzzles | Many possible paths or number combinations | Usually best left for the end |
If there's one DILR lesson in this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis, it's this: the number that decides your score isn't how many questions you touch. It's how many sets you close.
A student who fully solves two sets with no errors usually sits ahead of one who starts five sets and abandons each halfway. Partial work on a set still costs the reading and table-building time, but returns only a fraction of the marks. That's the single most common DILR mistake we see in post-exam score discussions.
Spend the first five to six minutes reading the opening lines and constraints of every set. Mark the sets with fixed anchors, small grids or direct data, and start there. If a set hasn't resolved after eight to ten minutes, move on and come back only if time allows.
If you spend too long on a set that turns out to be a trap, don't over-read it as a disaster. In a section like DILR, the percentile curve is usually forgiving at the middle and harsh only at the very top.
| Attempts | Sets Solved (approx.) | Accuracy | Approximate Net Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 3 | 90% | 31 |
| 10 | 2–2.5 | 90% | 26 |
| 8 | 2 | 90% | 21 |
DILR decides more CAT percentiles than any other section, and set selection decides DILR. Two clean sets are a strong result in most recent papers. A third set is what separates the 99 percentile from the 95 percentile.
The Quantitative Ability section has 22 questions and, in recent CAT papers, ranges from moderate to moderately difficult. Arithmetic carries the largest share of questions, followed by Algebra, with Geometry, Number System and Modern Math making up the rest. The section includes a mix of MCQs and TITA questions. Good attempts in QA are around 11 to 14, with Arithmetic being the most scoring area.
Overall QA difficulty: Moderate to moderately difficult (recent CAT trend)
QA difficulty in CAT depends heavily on the Algebra and Geometry questions. Arithmetic questions are usually approachable for both engineers and non-engineers, so a student who clears most of the Arithmetic block builds a solid base score even when the rest of the section is tough.
| Topic | Number of Questions (Recent Trend) | Difficulty Level | Time-Intensive? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic (percentages, profit and loss, ratio and mixtures, time-speed-distance, time and work, SI/CI, averages) | 8–10 | Easy to moderate | Sometimes (TSD, mixtures) |
| Algebra (equations, inequalities, functions, logarithms, progressions) | 5–7 | Moderate to difficult | Varies by question |
| Geometry and Mensuration | 3–4 | Moderate to difficult | Yes, without the key construction |
| Number System | 2–3 | Moderate | Low to moderate |
| Modern Math (P&C, probability, set theory, sequences) | 1–2 | Moderate | Low |
| Total | 22 | Moderate to moderately difficult | – |
We've added a "Time-Intensive?" column to this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis because QA difficulty and QA length are different problems. An algebra question on a function's range can be conceptually tough but finish in 90 seconds once you see the trick. A time-speed-distance question with three moving bodies can be well within syllabus and still eat four minutes. When you review your QA paper, sort your skipped questions into these two buckets. The first bucket tells you about concept gaps; the second tells you about selection.
| Sub-Topic | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Percentages, profit and loss | Appear in almost every slot and are usually quick to solve |
| Ratio, mixtures and averages | Frequent and scoring, though some take longer to calculate |
| Time-speed-distance and time and work | Common in recent papers; often framed as word problems |
| Equations, inequalities and functions | The core of the Algebra block and often TITA |
| Logarithms and progressions | Short questions that reward formula fluency |
| Triangles and circles | The most common Geometry areas in CAT |
| Attempts | Accuracy | Approximate Net Score |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 85% | 34 |
| 12 | 85% | 29 |
| 10 | 85% | 24 |
| 8 | 85% | 19 |
Clear the Arithmetic block first, then pick the Algebra questions with a clear entry point. Leave long Geometry questions for the last few minutes. In recent CATs, non-engineers who secure the Arithmetic questions with high accuracy hold their own against engineers who attempt more but make more mistakes.
In any CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis, the MCQ-to-TITA ratio deserves attention for two reasons: it affects how much negative marking you're exposed to, and it changes how far a raw-score estimate can be trusted, since TITA answers are harder to recall exactly after the exam.
Recent CAT slots carry roughly 21 to 23 TITA questions out of 68. In VARC, the TITA questions are usually the para jumbles and odd-sentence-out questions, three to four in all. DILR and QA carry the rest, and in both sections TITA questions tend to be the ones that need a full calculation rather than option elimination.
Good attempts in CAT 2026 Slot 1, based on recent CAT papers, are around 14 to 17 in VARC, 9 to 12 in DILR and 11 to 14 in QA, for an overall range of 35 to 42. Good attempts refer to the number of questions a well-prepared student can attempt within the 40-minute sectional limit at about 80 to 90 percent accuracy. They are a benchmark for judging your performance, not an attempt target.
| Section | Good Attempts | Approximate Net Score at That Level |
|---|---|---|
| VARC | 14–17 | 31–40 |
| DILR | 9–12 | 23–31 |
| QA | 11–14 | 26–34 |
| Overall | 35–42 | 80–105 |
After CAT 2025, different websites published good-attempt figures for the same slot that looked wildly apart. Part of the reason was simple: some reported total attempts, while others reported net correct answers. Those are not the same number. Fourteen attempts at 85 percent accuracy is about 12 correct answers.
The figures in this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis are attempts, at the accuracy level stated in each section's table. Before you compare yourself with any analysis, including this one, check which of the two the publisher means.
In recent CAT years, a raw score of roughly 80 to 100 corresponds to the 99th percentile, about 55 to 70 to the 95th percentile and about 42 to 55 to the 90th percentile. The estimates in our CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis are built from these past score trends and the expected difficulty of the paper. Final percentiles are computed after normalisation across all three slots, so treat this table as a range, not a guarantee.
| Overall Percentile | Approximate Overall Raw Score (Recent Trend) |
|---|---|
| 99.5+ | 95–110 |
| 99 | 80–100 |
| 98 | 70–85 |
| 95 | 55–70 |
| 90 | 42–55 |
| 85 | 35–45 |
| 80 | 30–38 |
For a personalised estimate based on your own section-wise scores, use our CAT percentile predictor. Once the response sheet is out, you can replace your memory-based score with the exact one.
| Parameter | CAT 2026 Slot 1 (Pattern and Trend) | CAT 2025 Slot 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall difficulty | Moderate to moderately difficult | Moderate to moderately difficult |
| Total questions | 68 | 68 |
| Questions per section (VARC / DILR / QA) | 24 / 22 / 22 | 24 / 22 / 22 |
| TITA questions | Around 21–23 | 21–23 across slots |
| Number of RC passages | 4 | 4 |
| Largest QA area | Arithmetic | Arithmetic |
| Toughest section | DILR | DILR |
The CAT structure barely moves from one year to the next. What changes is the mix inside each section: the number of VA questions of each type, the size of DILR sets, and how much of QA comes from Algebra versus Arithmetic. Those shifts matter more for strategy than the headline difficulty rating.
Want the full picture of last year's paper? Read our CAT 2025 question paper and slot-wise analysis.
Alongside faculty ratings, student feedback is the second input to this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis. Reactions start coming in within minutes of the slot ending, and we add paraphrased student feedback here as it arrives.
When you read reactions, look for specific details rather than emotion. "The second DILR set looked easy but had a hidden constraint in the last line" tells you far more than "DILR was tough." Specific feedback from several students is a better guide to the paper than a single loud opinion.
No, not directly. CAT is held in three slots with different question papers, and raw scores from each slot go through a normalisation process before percentiles are calculated. If Slot 1 is tougher than the other slots, the same raw score is generally worth more after normalisation. What decides your percentile is how you perform relative to others who face comparable difficulty.
If there's one point from this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis we wish more students understood on exam day, it's this. Comparing your raw score with a friend from Slot 3 tells you very little. A 70 in a hard slot and a 70 in an easier slot are not the same performance, and the normalisation exists precisely to correct for that.
What you can control is how accurately you estimate your own raw score. Which brings us to the next step.
To calculate your CAT 2026 Slot 1 score, wait for the official response sheet and provisional answer key on the CAT website, then count correct and incorrect answers section-wise. Apply the marking scheme to MCQs and TITA questions separately, add the three sectional net scores, and compare the totals with the score vs percentile table in this CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis. Memory-based estimates made on exam day are usually off by several marks.
Expected CAT 2026 cut-offs become clearer after all three slots, but the CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis gives an early indication. In recent admission cycles, the older IIMs send most interview calls to General category candidates at the 98 to 99+ percentile, with strong sectional scores. Newer IIMs and top non-IIM B-schools typically call candidates in the 90 to 98 percentile range. Actual shortlists also weigh academics, work experience and diversity factors.
| Institute | Typical Overall Percentile for a Call (General, Recent Trend) |
|---|---|
| IIM Ahmedabad | 99+ |
| IIM Bangalore | 99+ |
| IIM Calcutta | 99+ |
| IIM Lucknow | 98.5–99+ |
| IIM Kozhikode | 97–99 |
| IIM Indore | 97–99 |
| FMS Delhi | 98+ |
| MDI Gurgaon | 95–97 |
| Newer IIMs | 90–96 |
These are indicative ranges, not official figures. The IIMs publish their own shortlisting criteria, and a percentile above a "cut-off" doesn't guarantee a call. Our detailed CAT cut-off for IIMs page covers category-wise and institute-wise figures.
If you're writing CAT 2026 Slot 2 or Slot 3, don't change your strategy based on the CAT 2026 Slot 1 analysis. Each slot has a different question paper, and the difficulty can swing in either direction. Stick to the sectional plan you practised in mocks, spend the first minutes of each section scanning for doable questions, and judge difficulty inside the exam, not from what you read between slots.
The temptation is real. You read that Slot 1 DILR is brutal, and you walk in planning to attempt fewer sets. Then your DILR turns out to be friendly, and you've already talked yourself into a conservative target. We see this happen every year.
Use the Slot 1 analysis for one narrow purpose: knowing which question types are in play. If a new VA type shows up in Slot 1, it may well appear later in the day too, and it helps to know how to approach it. Beyond that, close the tab and rest.
Our CAT 2026 Slot 2 and Slot 3 analyses go live after each session ends.
Once the exam is behind you, what happens next is a fairly predictable sequence:
| Event | Expected Timeline |
|---|---|
| Response sheet and provisional answer key | First week of December 2026 (tentative) |
| Objection window | 2–3 days after the provisional key |
| Final answer key | Before the result |
| CAT 2026 result | First week of January 2027 (tentative) |
| IIM shortlists | From January 2027 onwards |
Between the exam and the result, two things are worth your time. First, if you're writing other MBA entrance exams, switch to their pattern. Second, start building your WAT-PI preparation early: reading for current affairs, revisiting your academic subjects, and drafting honest answers to "Why MBA?" Students who start interview prep only after shortlists arrive usually feel rushed.
When results are announced, the scorecard is available on the official CAT website, and our result coverage explains the steps to download it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the CAT 2026 Slot 1 exam overall?

Which section is the toughest in CAT 2026 Slot 1?

What are the good attempts in CAT 2026 Slot 1?

How many questions are there in CAT 2026 Slot 1?

Is there any change in the CAT 2026 exam pattern in Slot 1?

Is CAT 2026 Slot 1 easier or tougher than Slot 2 and Slot 3?

SHARE