In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court underscored the importance of faith in the governance process, regardless of the political party in power. This principle was central during a hearing concerning a petition that challenged the Maharashtra government's proposed development of land near the Mahalakshmi racecourse in South Mumbai.

The dispute involved a plan, discussed between Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Commissioner, and associates of the Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC), to convert a portion of the racecourse into a public garden.

Representing the state, the counsel argued that the legal challenge was premature since the government had not finalized the decision, describing it as a mere proposal. Justices GS Patel and Kamal Khata, presiding over the bench, advised the petitioners against early and hasty legal actions, emphasizing trust in the state's governance.

The court firmly stated that there was no failure in governance and stressed the need for citizens and judicial bodies to have confidence in governmental processes, refraining from undue skepticism about its operational style. The court highlighted the importance of developing reliance on government workings.

However, the court acknowledged the petition and the concerns it raised. In response, it held that issuing a writ of mandamus was inappropriate at this stage, aligning with the state counsel's argument that the land transformation proposal was yet to be finalized. The court emphasized the prematurity of the petition, pointing out that the proposal might still be retracted by the authorities.

In conclusion, the court's ruling advised petitioners to foster trust and confidence in government operations, leaving the petition pending. This decision reflects a broader call for faith in governance amidst ongoing political and developmental debates.